Dom

You dont ever have full clue when you state things. Doesn't stop you.

Is Trump guilty of a crime that anyone else would have been charged with?
Was the crime "constructed" from piecing together NY and federal statutes and then assuming a bridge?
Or was it, a party machine hell bent on figuring out a way to destroy him?

Whatever it was? It elected him. People were more concerned with what they saw trying to destroy Trump...than Trump.

Did he sexually assault the woman in NYC.?
I dont know. I wasnt there.
The victim claimed that it occurred somewhere between the fall of 1995 and Spring of 1996. Almost 3 decades later, all of a sudden, a billionaire who hates Trump is financing her lawsuit.
I wish that she had gone to the police on the day that the alleged assault occurred.

Foggy? Primarily politically motivated? .....A big part of it for sure. Consider Rob, he will believe anything bad said about Trump.
Was all of that disqualifying? Apparently not.

For you DOM, for what it's worth.
The philosophical doctrine that I try to live by is "consequentialism." It's imperfect when applied to real life sometimes, but I try start there.

Trump and Harris were the only viable names on the ballot. I had no control over that.
The border was a mess. One candidate would truly try to fix it. One would say it could not be fixed.
One is in favor of inmates and servicemen getting govt bought sex change operations, one said bullsh+t.
One was in favor of DEI being prioritized over all other concerns, one said bullsh+t
One was endorsed by most if not all the LEO agencies in the country and the other was considered a de facto criminal advocate.

You dont like me Dom.
This afternoon you dont like me worse than you dont like Rob.
So you're piling on me here with your usual Phumduck nonsense.
You think that you are going to offer the clear, boiled down, view of events and personalities...not reality.
Different day, same Domb.

https://soundcloud.com/sunset-poet-of-texas