Steve

He was found guilty by his peers in an area that is 90 percent (or so) populated by the opposition party voters.
OJ WAS FOUND INNOCENT by a jury of his peers? WAS HE?

Teddy Kennedy is relevant.. What-about-ism is entirely relevant. Here is the explanation...

If you want to me to care about what TRUMP did wrong 30 years ago, you should have raised this much hell about Kennedy walking intoxicated manslaughter. Or condemning Clarence Thomas over a pubic hair.
If you want me to agree with you about the raid on Mara lago, you should have been just as adamant about about a VP stealing classified dox and handing them over to a biographer for the purposes of self aggrandizement...and then having the biographer burn them.

You were not...so I am not.

The border remains my primary concern. The rest of it is noise.