Originally Posted by JAPOV
You're right Marty, the Gay and Lesbian review is MUCH better! wink

Not familiar with that, but I'll take your word for it.

Read both articles. Bout what I expected. No way to really verify anything, unless you could interview a caveman from 150000 years ago.
Imho...they started with the desired conclusion and worked their way back from there. The latter weaved in all sorts of anatomical references that I know nothing about.

My opinion...
Proves nothing. Changes nothing.

Onward through the fog.