I don't think they can answer those questions without a) revealing the secrets of their system to competitors, or b) giving enough statistical info to make it possible to game their system.

If they show how many people vote, that also opens the door to how many people you might need to ensure a skewed vote.

We keep saying THEY should come up with a new way to do it. But they already came up with their own brand new innovation, and it is more gameproof than any other you're likely to find. It's not only free, you might in fact get money FROM them. Many of us have won or been in finals.

So why are we--the most likely beneficiaries of their site--also their harshest critics?