Thanks Mike,

It is funny how different tastes move us around, and very interesting too. Sometimes thats basically all we got when giving feedback, as the decisions of craft really can go numerous ways..

I really meant that I rushed through this critique, and that the suggestions I made without accounting for the 'middle math', could look funny. So it wasn't just me being sensitive..

Im sorry I pushed you to spend a lot of time explaining, that was not my intention.

I felt when listening that the song could use more to create interest in the first three sections, as it then would feel more like the later add ons in the arrangement was sustaining and not just building. I tried to make a point out of the difference between building and sustaining, allthough Im not sure how it came across, or if it has any viability at all.

I still stand on my position of being able to pose the questions yourself as something self-intuitive to be listen to, though. The logic would be that what you ask for (can see/ hear) must be on a conscious level, and that there then is a job to be done scrutinizing that sensibility.

Im not questioning the fact that it is perfectly legit and useful to ask questions on arrangement, interest and dead spots, on the contrary, those can provide very useful feedback IMO

Great job, Mike, thanks for staying in dialogue!