Kevin

The problem that you have Kevin is that so many people have real world experience and common sense. As stated above, 1.2 million mail-in votes were cast in GA. The winning margin was 15,000. An urban dem machine with control covering a margin that small and further assuming that the forgeries could be discarded before scrutinized and would get lost in the mix... is not hard to imagine. It needs to be verified.

It appears that the write-ins were not carefully qualified. In PA and maybe Ga, the means to qualify them was discarded.

per the NYT article in 2012, mail-ins lend themselves to fraud and pose a risk. Now...in a Trump election...they are presented as virtually flawless by the same NYT.

With 1.2 million votes lending themselves to fraud and so many people such as yourself who want Trump out so bad that the means justifies the end....

Well, the more you insist that I believe the results on their current face...the more I want them scrutinized. And if that never happens...then the doubt never cures. Which is also very bad for the country.

Common sense suggests that verification is what the country needs. And i just cant figure out what is hurt by verification.

"Trust but verify" or maybe just "verify"