Originally Posted by John Voorpostel


Canadian and international sites and sites such as AP, Reuters etc have no dog in this fight and no interest in shaping public opinion.



John V

I like you and I want to help you any way that I can.

I am going to start by telling you that you are a highly biased liberal and if you think that a news site is good, it is because it feeds your bias.
Kid yourself, but dont kid ol' Marty.

Oh no?

You are a Canadian seemingly consumed by a US presidential election. Specifically by the election of your liberal candidate and I doubt that you ever supported a repub. Massive bias. Btw...USA Today has a liberal slant for sure. Though not nearly as blatant as CNN.

In other news.... I stumbled across a site that I really like. And you might also.

https://theconversation.com/us

It is apparently a bunch of academicians who post misc info to a website. Clearly liberal...Butt....they intersperse a lot of solid and interesting facts on a lot of topics.
I learned about the election of Rutherford Hayes there. That election was a firestorm like this current one except much worse I think. If you are unaware of this site and like learning for the sake of learning...which I think that you do...I think that you will enjoy it for being heavier on facts than propaganda.

Though there is propaganda. Where there are humans, there are distortions.



Martin

https://soundcloud.com/sunset-poet-of-texas