Originally Posted by John Voorpostel
But that is not what they are after in their lawsuit. If it was a surgical attack on voter fraud that would be different and I would be fine with it

The Penna lawsuit is saying that Penna's mail in ballot system is unconstitutional because it created 2 classes of voters subject to different rules....and seeks to simply disqualify them en masse without any evidence of fraud...just because they were handled differently



Dont let the trees block the view of the forest.

That is one lawsuit. There are others.
It is about whether an election was stolen or not. Elections have state regulations in place prior to elections. Ballots that do not comply with those rules are not supposed to be counted. To my understanding the PA courts changed the rules without the required legislative process. That is one suit. That makes the late arriving ballots non-compliant.

Other lawsuits said that standards vary from one county to another and that caused non-compliance per federal law as established during the W-Gore fiasco. I dont truly understand that.

Here is the nut of it...
The RNC is trying to chase down and disqualify all ballots that are falsified or Non-compliant with federal law or state law. If a ballot is found to be truthful and compiiant...it counts. If not...it doesnt.

I see no problem with that.