Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayside
by Gary E. Andrews - 10/19/26 10:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,943 Likes: 3
Top 10 Poster
|
Top 10 Poster
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,943 Likes: 3 |
I have been reading along here and I just can't figure out your argument, Kenneth. Are you saying that because the technology to copy music is ubiquitous, then is should not be illegal to copy and share recorded music?
If you follow this along to a logical conclusion, then musicians will only be paid for live performances (if they can get someone to pay) -- any recordings would be free to copy and share. Is this the end result you think is fair? You might and that is OK, but don't expect the majority of writers of original material to agree with you.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
|
Forums118
Topics129,163
Posts1,186,066
Members21,480
| |
Most Online236,505
Jul 1st, 2026
|
|
|
"Quality = Longevity." –Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|
