I got the points, Gavin said basicly even if Paul could be proved to have written those letters, it wouldnt mean that what the letters said were true. Even if he believed it himself 100%

I could prove somebody authored a book, but i may not be able to prove as to what they said happened, happened.

I can prove OJ wrote the book. "I want to tell you" Does that mean the book is true?

We see alot more of the questioning today, because its become popular sport to immediately think who ever said something or wrote something is up to something. And we have all these tools to help us break that down. And we still have biases, some people swear by somebody, some people swear AT somebody.

The reason you dont see modern media controversy about the bible is because its so long ago anyway. There was no way in the previous thousands of years to make a real dent in it, the internet has changed the game.

And If Jesus were alive today, and doing his ministry today, he'd get some press and covergae for sure, but youd have everybody, and probably couch and Japov saying it was BS

We just didnt have that capacity when this stuff was written, and didnt for the thousands of years following it.

Im not denying Jesus lived, and I have no way to deny He was the son of God, there is just no way to prove he was either. Just cause somebody wrote HE IS THE MESSIAH, doesnt make it true.


Last edited by Fdemetrio; 07/22/21 01:03 PM.