Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 9,113 Likes: 97
Top 20 Poster
|
OP
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 9,113 Likes: 97 |
I've said many times here that the shift would go back to live music it doesn't prove anything was not written by ai, but at least proves you are capable of performing What??? Are you saying songwriters have to be capable of performing? If you can't perform live, you're not a songwriter? Nope. Talking about artist songs. If your a songwriter not performing, nobody should be concerned with the sound or the means of production. Your a songwriter and not a performer. So way too much emphasis on the sound of the demo If you are claiming you are the artist, you should be able to perform, in which case the sound and production all matter. Not too hard to follow right little guy? I think my question made perfect sense, actually. Your original post said that the shift would be back to live music because it would at least prove that someone is capable of performing. You didn't make the songwriter/artist distinction in that post, so I asked a reasonable question. And in your case, that's why I'm curious. You post AI-generated songs and say you write the lyrics, play various instruments, and can sing. But what we actually hear are AI-generated recordings. So if you're making the distinction between “songwriter” and “artist/performer,” I think it's fair to ask where you see yourself in that distinction. I'm not questioning whether you can sing or play. I'm just saying that if live performance is supposed to be the thing that demonstrates you're actually an artist/performer, then an AI-generated recording doesn't demonstrate that. It demonstrates what the AI can produce. If you watched the Biato video it coincides with my comments. Songwriters got too caught up in the demo mainly when the home recording boom hit, the focus shifted to how my reverb sounds, instead of if my song is good. It shouldn't matter what the recording sounds like, its a Songwriters demo. Nothing else. I've done both and enjoy both If you want to create ai personas, and make that your product, I guess you could, but still makes you a creator not a musician or performer I think the shift has and will go to live, because the world is so ai aware, they'll want to see what's real and what isn't. I believe its still the person that creates interest, its always been about the person behind the song. Except for cheesy pop and dance who's only purpose is to dance. But your condescending responses to me, take a step back dude. I don't wanna go there
Last edited by Fdemetrio; 09/04/26 12:17 AM.
|
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
|
Forums118
Topics128,967
Posts1,185,489
Members21,480
| |
Most Online236,505 Jul 1st, 2026
|
|
|
"If you are stuck in your musical composing, be unreasonable. Change your environment. If you are stuck in your lyrical efforts, instead of forcing the same old words out, force yourself to do unreasonable things." -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|