JPF Home Page Forums Creative Arts Forums Creative Writing Forum Rigged

I'm not sure what the problem is with Matthew as FD's posts are disjointed and not very well informed, making the longer ones tempting to avoid.

Most of the NT was written before the fall of Jerusalem in 70AD and the synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) compiment each other very well, each sharing much of their material. Compare Matt 5 with Luke 6. The authors each had different aims. Matthew directed his Gospel at Jews, showing how Jesus fulfilled much of what was written by the prophets. Mark primarily wrote for Gentiles. Luke was a physician and he includes certain medical details the others do not.

What is important to modern authors was not necessarily important to them, such as strict adherence to chronology.

Of course, critics are going to come along and claim this or that. In the 60s some critics claimed Mick and Keith didn't write Satisfaction, Otis Redding did.
Professional bloviator Greil Marcus claimed Robbie Robertson's songs meant this or that in Mystery Train ( that book is nonsense). Robbie just shook his
head. People deduced by "clues" in Beatles' songs that Paul was dead.

And that's while the writers were still alive.

Hundreds of years later, critics can say what they want. They don't know anything.

There are hundreds of manuscripts of NT writings in Koine Greek, all agreeing with each other in content, many quite ancient. There is testimony from people who lived within decades of the authors. Documents such as 1st Clement mention the martyrdom of Peter and Paul and reference many NT works, proving they were already in wide circulation by the early 2nd century.

Read the Bible for yourself. It contains all the hallmarks of authenticity. If you believe it, you'll be compelled to change your life.

Which is why it has so many enemies.