Andrew,
Thanks for the interesting data on MJ. I know that a skin condition is not exactly fodder for the press. Thus, it would most likely be suppressed as news so they could continue to promote their negative slants to sell papers.

Only with knowledge does understanding ensue. Without facts, people tend to dub in their own interpretations. It is these very interpretations which serve to illuminate each person for how they think, react and act in everyday life. You can tell much by the exact emotion generated in any communication.

For example, how often do we ever hear anything positive in the media? I'd say about two percent of the time. They are vultures, preying off the fact that the masses are more interested in negative news.

It's a sad commentary on the state of humankind IMHO.


"And, in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make." Paul McCartney