Mondo Kewl, Brian!
I'm seeing a big number of new signatures (which I was hoping for), and we're getting to see a fine sampling of widely varied styles!
But, OOPS, already somebody didn't bother to check the [very simple] rules. Please ask them to decide which of their entries they'd like considered. If these are two different people from the same town, sharing the same name, I apologize well in advance....
This is fun; read every one carefully so far (except my own, in which my proofreading was so slack, I had to edit a couple times [Linked Image] ), and have already begun some "whittling". As I scroll through, it's quite easy for the titles to recall the pieces I particularly like; so whomever has the voting to do shouldn't find this a terribly hard go...

Enjoying it, Brian,
Thanks

[Edit]:
One small comment on "signatures". I don't really see these links as having anything to do with the specific lyric content that's posted here, and actually see it as kind of a "dodge" that puts me off a bit. As in: "You can only dig it properly if heard with the music..." That's just a personal take, but if I'm finding it a wee bit distasteful, others may too. I'm all in favor of self-advertising, but in this ONE instance, it may not seem appropriate; the lyric should speak for itself, no?
Comments appreciated, and I'll gladly change my viewpoint if properly convinced that I'm all wet! [Linked Image] (Not an uncommon thing fer me, BTW. [Linked Image] )

[This message has been edited by Ozone Pete (edited 08-10-2002).]