Originally Posted by JAPOV
Originally Posted by Kay-lynn Carew
Well, if I give two people the same tools they will make two totally different things!

It could be a hammer, nails and some lumber. One will build a house and one will build a crooked outhouse.
It could be 3 eggs, a pan and some heat. One will make 3 fried eggs and one will make a souffle.

AI can't cover up bad songwriting. (well, not that I know of)

WRONG.

AI is designed to only plagiarize the best of what's already been done.

You tend to complain that AI adds too much to your guitar/vox recordings.
Newsflash hun, there's nothing at all original about what you do.
AI can't learn anything from you...

You are precisely who SUNO caters too.

Tony, I think Kay-lynn’s point actually highlights something important.

Tools don’t determine the outcome — the person using them does.

Give two people the same guitar and you’ll hear two completely different songs. Give two producers the same DAW and plugins and you’ll get two completely different records. Same hammer, same lumber — different builder, different house.

AI doesn’t change that dynamic.

It doesn’t magically turn a weak idea into a great one. If the input is uninspired, the output usually is too. The human still brings the taste, direction, storytelling, and emotional intent.

And plagiarism isn’t really how these systems work. They’re trained to recognize patterns in music and language, not to store and reassemble existing songs.

Human creativity still sits at the center of the process — AI just adds another instrument to the studio.

Greg