Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,240 Likes: 6
Top 25 Poster
|
OP
Top 25 Poster
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,240 Likes: 6 |
That's a false analogy, Kevin.
A. The Ukraine didn't know Trump was considering withholding funds. The transcript says no such thing. You can't quote the transcript. You're giving a biased interpretation of it, same as Schiff. Finally, the Ukraine received the funds. A total waste of US taxpayer money.
B. You're leaving out an important detail. The "favor" was Ukraine investigating an obvious criminal. Joe Biden is on tape bragging about getting a Ukrainian prosececutor fired. As POTUS, it's well within Trump's rights to ask for an investigation. Biden and his hopelessly corrupt son belong to a different political party? Doesn't matter.
You doubt his motives? So what? There's no predicating crime. Blathering on about Hamilton is therefore irrelevant.
Quote the transcript verbatim, then the statute Trump violated verbatim. You can't. All you can do is slant what was
said. It's a hoax.
|
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
|
Forums118
Topics129,174
Posts1,186,189
Members21,480
| |
Most Online236,505
Jul 1st, 2026
|
|
|
"Do not endeavor to be the smartest kid in a dumb class. Instead, you are better off being the dumbest kid in the smartest class, where you will be challenged and you will learn. If you aren't growing, you are dying." -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|
