Originally Posted by JAPOV
I actually debated "carnage" because.... well, I've seen that. But, do you really feel that the "fault line" play on words isn’t obvious enough in this context Gav?


It's obvious enough, Tony, it just doesn't work as well because a fault line is not something you would encounter on a battlefield. No man's land keeps that battlefield metaphor alive, as does carnage. Instead of a collection of "stand-alone" images, you have one that you flesh out over the whole verse. Just my thoughts, not necessarily the best way to go.