nothing = the absence of existence

BUT

if there is an absence of existence, then that means nothing could ever exist because there is no growth if there is nothing to grow from.

That also means if nothing can grow, nothing can be destroyed. So duality can't exist either because there are NO opposites to balance existence and non-existence.

SO

if the argument that nothing is improbable, then that means existence of something has always been. If existence of something has always been, then something can be grown and/or destroyed, re-constructed, and cycles are born.

The complexities of existence also require management and organization, otherwise something would remain at their base element. That implies someone nudges something in a purposeful design.

Nothing would be an absolute 0, but there is no absolute 0. There is 1 and a -1 with a mediator in between. :-)