Ninety-percent of ninety-percent of whoever will not like what someone does.
But if someone gets something from it, that is good enough for me.
It is upon that person to come around it.
I am not out to be famous, and the professional conformity would feel too cold to me anyway.
I am just doing what I am doing, others elsewhere seem to like it, and I have that bone in my head being a rank amatuer with my little bit of experience.
My reality lies in the present, not wishful thinking.

The only point I was making is that if one is out strictly to perform on their recordings through a simple .wav program, there is always going to be that shock of adapting to different software.
But I learned to play to it, the rest will follow.

I have been learning more about ballad pop, and people can see those strides in it as far as I know.
I just want to fit whatever inspires me into a 3 part song.
I'm trying to tackle 4 different instruments doing that and what inspires me does'nt neccesarialy fit in a study book at all times.
It depends on what one gets into often as to what sounds on course. I look for if people know what I am attempting to play (style) without me saying it and if it is yet original sounding as instruction.
But since I am out to learn strict songcraft with that exact melody and rythmn, practice helps.
My attack has improved from what many have told me just by practicing to rythmn samples.
That is what I have used Audacity for up until now.

I have still been taking advice on time sigs.
Though I never copy a rythmn for a recording.
But samples do help to practice to and the sounds in Audacity can really perk up the ears.

http://www.f3music.com/444