Originally Posted by Sunset Poet
Originally Posted by Rob B.
Marty, what exactly are you trying to prove here? I wrote this song — I think I know better than anyone what it’s about.
Your Gemini actually explained the issue perfectly. When you added “written in 2025,” it said the text might most likely refer to Trump. Of course it did. If you change the year to 2016, it will guess Clinton. If you set it to 1974, it will guess Nixon. In 2030, it’ll guess whoever is in the headlines then.
An AI’s guess isn’t evidence of anything — it just mirrors the way the question is framed.

No. No. No. Rob.
It is not 2016.
It is 2025.
Trump and the Epstein circumstance match up now, which is precisely why I inserted 2025, not during Clinton or Abe Lincoln.
Your argument is weak because it is wrong.
And you know that.

This is no longer just the opinion of me or Dom.
GEMINI AI is the collective knowledge of all of humanity. All of humanity contradicts the line(s) that you are trying to sell here.

What am I trying to prove?
I'm letting you prove what I am trying to prove, by your incessant responses.

To me, and now possibly to the world at large, your responses are someone who is either, purposely being disingenuous (lying) or, unhinged enough to believe what they are saying (crazy).

Both are bad.
If you are lying...you should stop.
If you really believe what you are saying...you should tell your therapist that they are not helping you enough.

Your turn to voice your opinion.

Marty

Marty,
I think you’re giving Gemini far more authority than it actually has. An AI doesn’t represent “the collective knowledge of all humanity.” It just predicts patterns based on the way you framed your question. You fed it a date, a political context, and a metaphor, and it gave you a GUESS that fits that framing. That’s not proof of anything — it’s just pattern-matching. If you gave it different context, it would generate different assumptions. That’s how these models work.

Also, I wrote the song. I know exactly what inspired it. You’re free to interpret it however you want, but claiming your interpretation is the “correct” one because an AI model agreed with your prompt isn’t a strong argument.

As for the personal insults — I’m not going down that road. You can disagree with me without turning it into a diagnosis.
That’s my opinion.
— Rob