Rob,

Do you really think that you are going to render me lost in the trees, unable to see the forest?

In this case, it only takes one to tango. I don't need your permission to dance.

If I unilaterally decide that you are bashing Trump or making a political post, I do not require your permission to respond to it.

In addition to that you are trying to play this little cat and mouse game where you veil your political ramblings, behind the pretense that they are just allegorical fictional characters. They arent. We both know it.

So I've got you trying to bind me to an agreement while trying to mouse-trap me at the same time.
You dont have that sway here.


Let's take it further...
For the sake of argument, let's say that you really believe what you are saying and V1 was never intended to be a veiled Trump bash.

But then, I look at it and see direct parallels, that lo and behold, look coincidentally but unmistakably like Rachel Maddow regurgitations. Just based on the coincident appearance I will define the argument and offer counterpoints. I'm saving Democracy.

Marty is not bound by any agreement wherby Rob grants (or not) permission to Marty to respond to allegorical content that appears to be current political propaganda...or anything else.

You post something and I decide its political, then its fair game for comment and retort.

Now, this is coming back over on itself many times now. Time to close out.

Be aware that I will comment on things that I choose to comment on.

And once again, this opportunity to explore the many bi-partisan friends of Epstein with you has been enjoyable.

Marty

https://soundcloud.com/sunset-poet-of-texas