Does what constitute good music need to be form fitting?
I have tried that and going with myself. The general listenership seemed to like me more not being a form fitter, outsiside of professionals.

I have not wanted to be a performer snice my adolescence.
My originals consisted of an alongated riff.
Where I have attempted theory with more effort, I am understood least.
Often what is understood by musician clicks and professionals is considered effort.
It sure has not been that way to me.
It seems to all come down to aptitudes.

I could attempt a Beatles and beat rock type song with the scales. A listener rmay like that while the intellegensia may consider that an insult.

Maybe I am just not entitled to say since I have not been in that place.

There are many that are not associated with a musicians click or intellegensia that like to see what makes sense out of what they are doing.
It is something I can not put samples or even a meterenome on.

What are the members expectations on here with their services?
I know what should be understood of me, but what is formidible or good to members I look at within the context of my expression.
The second question I have is that do the members on here play in what is obtuse to them?
It matters too if they like that or not I guess.

The all prose type I have noticed with their own forms are often the most eclectic.