Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
The signs of the times are lost on the blind Who have eyes but refuse to see Those who have ears but refuse to hear Deny the truth that was given for free
Let the blood rise to the bridles Let them lament what they have done Let the meek reclaim God's gift In the name of the Triumphant Son
The vain and deceitful, the greedy and evil With crowns of gold but feet of clay The lion of Judah, Yeshua, hallelujah Will claim His throne on judgment day
Let the birds feast on their flesh Let their inequity be undone Let the lightning strike in the east And sound the return of the Triumphant Son
For me the weakness lies in some of the phrasing. It sounds like the singer is unsure what they are singing next I don't know if that's a product of the software, or just your phrasing choices.
But it's a really good production and nice piece of music. Like the chord change in chorus.
You know I love your stuff and I thought I was really going to like this too when the piano started. I liked the piano all the way through. The AI voice is pretty good too. For me, though, the melody didn't really take off, although it's pleasant enough. A bit like English folk music of the 70s. I enjoyed it more the second time.
The lyric doesn't speak to me because I'm not into that kind of thing, but it's well written
What do you guys want another debate on who can sing or not ? Battle of the AI singers
Dom is a highly opinionated voyeur.... desperately struggling with his sexual desire for Springsteen, and over compensating for his stage fright by intellectualizing the songwriting process. Problem is... he has no cerebral tools to work with.
So, mostly, all he has to offer is contradictory criticism, and meaningless comparative banality to his imaginary lover...
What do you guys want another debate on who can sing or not ? Battle of the AI singers
Dom is a highly opinionated voyeur.... desperately struggling with his sexual desire for Springsteen, and over compensating for his stage fright by intellectualizing the songwriting process. Problem is... he has no cerebral tools to work with.
So, mostly, all he has to offer is contradictory criticism, and meaningless comparative banality to his imaginary lover...
I wish he'd just "come out" already!
Perhaps meaningless music is the greater evil?
Dom is so inept that you want to collab with him so badly, I suppose to make you feel alive.
Springsteen did more for me as a singer songwriter, than hal Lindsay has done for your mess of a psyche
Btw, have you received your Hal Lindsay dildo yet? I know you said the delivery time was predicted by Hal himself.
What do you guys want another debate on who can sing or not ? Battle of the AI singers
Dom is a highly opinionated voyeur.... desperately struggling with his sexual desire for Springsteen, and over compensating for his stage fright by intellectualizing the songwriting process. Problem is... he has no cerebral tools to work with.
So, mostly, all he has to offer is contradictory criticism, and meaningless comparative banality to his imaginary lover...
I wish he'd just "come out" already!
Perhaps meaningless music is the greater evil?
Dom is so inept that you want to collab with him so badly, I suppose to make you feel alive.
Springsteen did more for me as a singer songwriter, than hal Lindsay has done for your mess of a psyche
Btw, have you received your Hal Lindsay dildo yet? I know you said the delivery time was predicted by Hal himself.
There you go, projecting your insecurities upon the "big bad world" again, Dom.
What do you guys want another debate on who can sing or not ? Battle of the AI singers
Dom is a highly opinionated voyeur.... desperately struggling with his sexual desire for Springsteen, and over compensating for his stage fright by intellectualizing the songwriting process. Problem is... he has no cerebral tools to work with.
So, mostly, all he has to offer is contradictory criticism, and meaningless comparative banality to his imaginary lover...
I wish he'd just "come out" already!
Perhaps meaningless music is the greater evil?
Dom is so inept that you want to collab with him so badly, I suppose to make you feel alive.
Springsteen did more for me as a singer songwriter, than hal Lindsay has done for your mess of a psyche
Btw, have you received your Hal Lindsay dildo yet? I know you said the delivery time was predicted by Hal himself.
I'm not taking sides here, but that was actually pretty good LOL
The thought of looking at a 80 year old pregnant women is unsettling Its almost like Steven King and sorts wrote the Bible yeah we still have monkeys , so the whole evolution thing is also full of holes
We’re all built from the same dust and dreams, Different roads, but the same means.
The fact that covid has changed so many times since the pandemic proves evolution.
But this argument has hershrll walker written all over it.
This is the thing
Firstly, humans did not evolve from monkeys. Instead, monkeys and humans share a common ancestor from which both evolved around 25 million years ago. This evolutionary relationship is supported both by the fossil record and DNA analysis. A 2007 study showed that humans and rhesus monkeys share about 93% of their DNA.Oct 4, 2011
I don’t think Dom has a sense of humor Cuz I said Mick Jagger can’t sing
Did you say something funny? Lol might of missed it
Nah I don't care what u think of mick, was just trying to instill a shot of reality.
Legendary singer,. I will say, I never understood a word he sang cause of his accent. I remember doing covers and before the net trying to write down stones lyrics by listening.
Needless to say I did a better job of understanding Keith's riffs...
I think I'm talking too much here trying to get others involved. Not workin.
The fact that covid has changed so many times since the pandemic proves evolution.
But this argument has hershrll walker written all over it.
This is the thing
Firstly, humans did not evolve from monkeys. Instead, monkeys and humans share a common ancestor from which both evolved around 25 million years ago. This evolutionary relationship is supported both by the fossil record and DNA analysis. A 2007 study showed that humans and rhesus monkeys share about 93% of their DNA.Oct 4, 2011
Dom... DNA is God's blueprint for "life". Every mammal on this planet shares 90% of the code.
But, we still don't understand it... and certainly can't create or improve upon it.
Think about it... "Millions of years"? It has only taken us the last hundred years to effectively destroy the planet in the name of profitable industry.
God's gift of intellect, and man's tendency to self destruct, isn't in keeping with the laws of natural evolution...
The fact that covid has changed so many times since the pandemic proves evolution.
But this argument has hershrll walker written all over it.
This is the thing
Firstly, humans did not evolve from monkeys. Instead, monkeys and humans share a common ancestor from which both evolved around 25 million years ago. This evolutionary relationship is supported both by the fossil record and DNA analysis. A 2007 study showed that humans and rhesus monkeys share about 93% of their DNA.Oct 4, 2011
Dom... DNA is God's blueprint for "life". Every mammal on this planet shares 90% of the code.
But, we still don't understand it... and certainly can't create or improve upon it.
Think about it... "Millions of years"? It has only taken us the last hundred years to effectively destroy the planet in the name of profitable industry.
God's gift of intellect, and man's tendency to self destruct, isn't in keeping with the laws of natural evolution...
Not denying any of that there's room for God in evolution, but we can't deny what we know to be true.
Monkees are still around for the same reason we are, were both primates.
The fact that all life on this planet shares a majority of DNA code isn't proof of 25,000,000yrs worth of evolution.
That's not to mention, carbon dating is NOT a PROVEN science... Humans haven't yet built a time machine lol.
Look, we actually seem to share a great love of science. But, common sense dictates, since there's much more money in science fiction than the Bible, there's obviously more politics in science than scripture
yeah and any time in history that a scientist discovered something the church, or religious doctrine didn't like, they were executed, punished, jailed, etc. all lovely things for a Christian to do to somebody ..ahem.
Galaleo discovered that the earth was not the center of the universe, that it rotated around the sun, like all other planets. Meaning it wasn't special, just another planet.
So he was placed on house arrest for rest of his life in case somebody might listen to him,...and he was right
The Bible says, or is interpreted as saying the earth is 10,000 years old. Wrong.
The problem is when you have something as deep seeded and inbred, and as personal, and as powerful as belief in God or The Bible, somebody notices something about nature and he gets attacked.
People do it here too.
We all need God, we all wanna believe, but we can't deny truth to keep our beliefs safe.
If a Doctor today was around in Bible times, they would know leprosy was caused by bacteria and antibiotics can cure it, and they'd probably be arrested or killed for suggesting it, after all the Bible people thought it was the Devil. It wasn't and isn't.
And Jesus being all knowing, would have known that too.
alot of times religious ideas come from the unexplained, when we explain it a scientific way, it's attacked.
I believe in a spiritual side of us, that maybe transcends death, we all want and need something to be there.
We hope we're right, but let's no mock science cause we don't like the implications
yeah and any time in history that a scientist discovered something the church, or religious doctrine didn't like, they were executed, punished, jailed, etc. all lovely things for a Christian to do to somebody ..ahem.
Galaleo discovered that the earth was not the center of the universe, that it rotated around the sun, like all other planets. Meaning it wasn't special, just another planet.
So he was placed on house arrest for rest of his life in case somebody might listen to him,...and he was right
The Bible says, or is interpreted as saying the earth is 10,000 years old. Wrong.
The problem is when you have something as deep seeded and inbred, and as personal, and as powerful as belief in God or The Bible, somebody notices something about nature and he gets attacked.
People do it here too.
We all need God, we all wanna believe, but we can't deny truth to keep our beliefs safe.
If a Doctor today was around in Bible times, they would know leprosy was caused by bacteria and antibiotics can cure it, and they'd probably be arrested or killed for suggesting it, after all the Bible people thought it was the Devil. It wasn't and isn't.
And Jesus being all knowing, would have known that too.
alot of times religious ideas come from the unexplained, when we explain it a scientific way, it's attacked.
I believe in a spiritual side of us, that maybe transcends death, we all want and need something to be there.
We hope we're right, but let's no mock science cause we don't like the implications
Let's be fair and unbiased
Despite your emphasis on historical superstitions propagated by government in the name of God... Ahem
This was actually quite well thought out, Dom. Agreed!
Yeah the planets billions of years old , all proven i'm not getting the bible 10,000 years old people Well not that I wanna get in a debate on when the universe was created lol
Last edited by bennash; 01/14/2411:44 PM.
We’re all built from the same dust and dreams, Different roads, but the same means.
Neither the age of the universe or the Earth is proven lol...
Also, science assumes that the speed of light is constant despite the fact that light can be divided into various spectrums... and bent. So, the size of the universe is also just a theory.
Scientists are just as guilty of propagating theory as fact... as "religious" zealots are guilty of twisting scripture. No gender? 72 virgins? Global warming? Alien origins? Right....
However, it CAN be proven that the Bible hasn't changed since Moses wrote the Pentateuch... and the argument regarding God has outlasted the greatest minds throughout history. That's a miracle in itself... and I haven't even mentioned prophecy
Bullshit its all carbon tested on layers of the earth , Going back millions of years Oh yeah aliens have landed more bullshit , and their always smarter then us right prophecy and Jesus is coming back i'm sure I'm going to get real relgious on heart surgery though , God bless , don't [naughty word removed] this up
Last edited by bennash; 01/15/2410:54 AM.
We’re all built from the same dust and dreams, Different roads, but the same means.
Neither the age of the universe or the Earth is proven lol...
Also, science assumes that the speed of light is constant despite the fact that light can be divided into various spectrums... and bent. So, the size of the universe is also just a theory.
Scientists are just as guilty of propagating theory as fact... as "religious" zealots are guilty of twisting scripture. No gender? 72 virgins? Global warming? Alien origins? Right....
However, it CAN be proven that the Bible hasn't changed since Moses wrote the Pentateuch... and the argument regarding God has outlasted the greatest minds throughout history. That's a miracle in itself... and I haven't even mentioned prophecy
That's true, the Bible doesn't change it's story. But it's interpretation is changed by anybody with an angle. The Bible is very confusing and vague.
And seemingly no two people agree on everything said in it.
But you're doing what said believers in Bible do.
You challenge science estimations, but the Bible is precise to you. And because it says 6000, years, and science says something else, you try to debunk their findings.
Science can save your life, and does everyday. Why dont you deny X-rays , or MRI or cat scans, saying that's not really the inside of this person, why don't you challenge your driving 60 mph? Or that being drink impairs your ability to drive?
Or that wearing a heavy coat in winter keeps you warm? Or that the sun will go down at 6 pm, or on Wednesday it will snow?
All that is science, the same science applied to everything. But because the Bible says 6000 years, let's deny it
And think about how dangerous it is to live in earth? Earthquakes, tornados, hurricanes, volcanos, meteors pummeling earth?
Why did God create the earth so dangerous to live in?
Neither the age of the universe or the Earth is proven lol...
Also, science assumes that the speed of light is constant despite the fact that light can be divided into various spectrums... and bent. So, the size of the universe is also just a theory.
Scientists are just as guilty of propagating theory as fact... as "religious" zealots are guilty of twisting scripture. No gender? 72 virgins? Global warming? Alien origins? Right....
However, it CAN be proven that the Bible hasn't changed since Moses wrote the Pentateuch... and the argument regarding God has outlasted the greatest minds throughout history. That's a miracle in itself... and I haven't even mentioned prophecy
That's true, the Bible doesn't change it's story. But it's interpretation is changed by anybody with an angle. The Bible is very confusing and vague.
And seemingly no two people agree on everything said in it.
But you're doing what said believers in Bible do.
You challenge science estimations, but the Bible is precise to you. And because it says 6000, years, and science says something else, you try to debunk their findings.
Science can save your life, and does everyday. Why dont you deny X-rays , or MRI or cat scans, saying that's not really the inside of this person, why don't you challenge your driving 60 mph? Or that being drink impairs your ability to drive?
Or that wearing a heavy coat in winter keeps you warm? Or that the sun will go down at 6 pm, or on Wednesday it will snow?
All that is science, the same science applied to everything. But because the Bible says 6000 years, let's deny it
And think about how dangerous it is to live in earth? Earthquakes, tornados, hurricanes, volcanos, meteors pummeling earth?
Why did God create the earth so dangerous to live in?
Seems you question everything except the Bible
The cool thing about the Bible is... It mirrors the character of God. God doesn't have anything to prove lol... So, if you doubt Him, that's your problem. The Bible is intentionally vague for a reason. Prophecy is the proof of God's Word, and is always 100% correct in hindsight. You either accept it or you don't. God is not a tyrant, but there won't be 8 Billion "last moment saints" in His kingdom... Also, as a believer, God expects you to exercise good common sense.
Your complaint seems to be... "Why isn't this Earth the garden of Eden"? Well... You know where the answer is lol.
God makes Hitler like he taught sunday school God is not a tyrant? man what book are you reading ? He's Mansion on 4 billion steroids now Jesus I don't see him as a serial killer This site is as dead as John the Baptist, Be heading if I was correct
Last edited by bennash; 01/15/2405:24 PM.
We’re all built from the same dust and dreams, Different roads, but the same means.
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
