Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
Lot Long
by Gary E. Andrews - 11/10/26 11:20 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 66
Serious Contributor
|
Serious Contributor
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 66 |
Ray - it may not seem obvious but if it takes 200mS or so to hear the result of anything you do, your workflow slows down substantially. You make an adjustment and think it sounds OK, only to realise that you've gone too far because the result you were hearing was delayed. It is like driving a car with a loose steering wheel.
I'm also not sure where you get the idea that 50dB is sufficient dynamic range. Most studio analogue recorders that I've used have getting on for 20dB more than that and even the old cheap 16 bit Soundblaster cards had over 80dB dynamic range. FM radio in the UK is capable of over 60dB too (although only BBC Radio 3 seems to make use of that range).
James.
|
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
|
Forums118
Topics129,176
Posts1,186,193
Members21,480
| |
Most Online236,505
Jul 1st, 2026
|
|
|
"Do not endeavor to be the smartest kid in a dumb class. Instead, you are better off being the dumbest kid in the smartest class, where you will be challenged and you will learn. If you aren't growing, you are dying." -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
