Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayside
by Gary E. Andrews - 10/19/26 10:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 54
Serious Contributor
|
Serious Contributor
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 54 |
Most of the home systems like Audacity and Reaper whilst having a fairly easy learning curve will not produce the pro results you may want. For radio ready you will most likely need the more expensive and difficult learning curve progs like Cubase and Protools or Logic.
And what, pray tell, is the difference in audio quality with Reaper vs Protools or Logic? HUGE BIG DIFFERENCE!!!!!!!! anybody who uses pro stuff and tries to compare it to Audacity or Reaper will tell you the same......Reaper is OK BUT does not nor ever will produce the radio ready sound a pro studio using Cubase or Protools can. LOL! The only thing that affects the sound in that equation is the "pro studio". Audio recorded by Reaper sounds exactly the same as audio recorded by Cubase or Pro Tools. What is it that you think Cubase or Pro Tools has over Reaper that makes them capable of producing "radio ready sound"?
|
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
|
Forums118
Topics129,163
Posts1,186,067
Members21,480
| |
Most Online236,505 Jul 1st, 2026
|
|
|
"Quality = Longevity." –Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|