I don't know what is worse.

In the first trial, there was clear evidence the police who investigated OJ were racist, corrupt, and planted evidence, which ALONE should have been grounds of acquital...and in fact, this is what swayed the jury....but don't take my word, go back and see what the jurors had to say.

Now some of you are agreeing that, man, they didn't get him the first time, but YEAHHHH, they got him now....so punish him this time for those murders for which he was acquitted.

This is, if you can at all stand back a bit, petty and vindictive...great underpinnings of justice....

But then justice in the US is not fair or blind or equitable....full stop.

20/20 did a great show on how the dumb and poor are browbeaten into accepting guilty pleas, even though there is scant evidence of guilt. And get this, even if afterwards there is clear evidence that person is NOT guilty, the justice systems says...ohhh, we can't do anything, they pled guilty....

Given your attitudes as exemplified here, it does not appear anyone will stand up to change this...so the innocent poor and dumb will continue to be browbeaten into prison, and in some cases will be innocent and executed....

Was OJ guilty of the murders? My opinion and yours are as valid as a fart in a windstorm...we'll just never know

And the lot of you who tie the two cases together and use it to justify the outcome of this case...well, you're pitiful and you suck...big time..

SJH...I'm with you 90%...except I see the evidence this time...he WAS guilty, (as were his cohorts who got off lightly for turning state's evidence) but he's being punished for the last time more than this crime...

My basic message to my Southern friends? This outcome should scare you more than it satisfies your blood lust

If writing ever becomes work I think I'm going to have to stop