Brian,
I want to give you a big here, here (if that is in fact the correct way to spell it, and in context of the use of the phrase!) for this blog, but I'm still a bit red faced at a small tyrade I went on in the fast blast section of the site!(so I'd have to say I was a perpetrator of this activity recently... I won't apologize for the comments... I applied every forum rule I have. However it did lead me to come up with another rule ( to keep from making an arse of myself)... It goes like this; There is a huge differance between being one who is stupid, and one who is ignorant (no offence meant)! So now I will ignore stupidity (one who is stupid is not capable of learning, one who is ignorant does not know any better), ignorance is a subject best treaded lightly on...

I don't mind too much when someone goes on a tyrade... er well sort of. It does chap my arse when someone continually argues their side, regardless of the out come, or subject. That leads me to another rule (an old one). Generally, when I run across an agrumenative post, I will tend to check out posts that person has made in the history of posting. If I find they always like to argue, then is't just not worth my time to even acknolige (Sp?) them (I do this frequently). This of cource generally makes the poster even madder... no skin of my back (the differance between stupidity, ignorance, and intelagance!).

I will admit I have been a bit testy latly... Corperate America is driving me mad. I reside in a differant portion of coperate America than most... the type if I told you about it, I'd have to kill ya!.. ;<( I do have an out (just about to impliment) so I should be OK soon.


http://www.myspace.com/chuckrudder