TerryJames seems to be knowledgeable about reocrding, and his pro-analog point of view is supported by enough other people that I am not prepared to dispute it. But in this thread, based on the original question, I think his comment is off base.

Anna was asking about comparing digital recorders with 4-track cessette recorders. Although high-end analog gear may be wonderful, the results you get from cassette recorders are not the same at all. I don't think any knowledgeable recording engineer would maintain that the signal quality of a multi-track cassette recorder is superior to 44.1 digital.

I would also add that the best way to rise above the other 100,000,000 home recordists is to develop a really great ear, develop and nurture your creativity and talent, try new things, and spend long, hard hours getting experience. In the end, the equipment you use will be of little matter.

[This message has been edited by TrumanCoyote (edited 09-23-2006).]