Originally Posted by Brian Austin Whitney
Originally Posted by bennash
You can sure rant Brian

Was there something you disagreed with? I was told by Suno I am among the Top edge case users of their site. I currently have uploaded over 1500 songs to them and generated over 80K versions of them, changing production, arrangements, genres etc. I started off against it, but then I actually used it. I also talked to a lot of Pro writers who do a lot of what I do and I have taught multiple hit songwriters how to use it effectively. It is allowing me to create a project I have worked on since the early 1990s. I never could afford to produce the music I had written for it, but now it is an incredible tool. No one has lost any of their rights, if someone infringes on someone else using Suno, the laws apply as they always have. here is zero danger to writers having their songs stolen or infringed on. If a human listens to the Eagles and it inspires and teaches them how to write songs like they did, that is okay, so why should a machine be any different. Auto generated music has been around since the dawn of Electronic music. Band in the Box for 35 years. No one cared because it isn't very good. If left to it's own devices AI music is only as good as what someone creates with it. It doesn't automatically generate anything good enough for success, at least I haven't heard anything auto generated that was good.

Covered wagon makers lost out to the car. And yet all these years later you can still buy a wagon. Not much is changed in the end.

Brian


I hated Band in A Box lol that's what caused alot of rifts between me and some the faithful here

I just thought it sounded so fake and mechanical, talk about robots, that sounded way more robotic than ai.

Cheese on display

But what it is, Is a great practice partner for musicians, which ironically, is why it was created for musicians to jam with and learn how to improvise over chord changes.

I don't have a good filter..lol.

Last edited by Fdemetrio; 2 hours ago.