11 members (Fdemetrio, Gary E. Andrews, Sunset Poet, couchgrouch, Brian Austin Whitney, Bill Draper, 4 invisible),
789
guests, and
254
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
Foray
by Fdemetrio - 04/23/24 12:11 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,589 Likes: 1
Top 40 Poster
|
OP
Top 40 Poster
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,589 Likes: 1 |
I was thinking about lyrics that are written BEFORE there is music composed for them. Some people say a lyric by itself is a poem, but that's not really true.
Just a thought here: I notice in a lot of good songs, the lyrical lines have a bizarre rhythm all their own....not necessarily measured by traditional poetic meter nor by syllable count, but by the line's own peculiar rhythm.
You can't just trust to syllable count, because rhythms may be different. For example, the following two lines both have six syllables:
Johnny is a rock star I want to suck your blood
...but they clash---they're too different to belong in the same musical phrase:
JOHNny is a ROCK star i WANT to SUCK your BLOOD
And sometimes lyrics employ MIXED meter instead of a long run of say, iambic pentameter that sounds like ta-DA ta-DA ta-DA ta-DA.
Like this one:
Tonight you're mine completely, You give your love so sweetly, Tonight the light of love is in your eyes, But will you love me tomorrow?
That's not so easy to classify from line to line...it follows it's own conversational rhythm pattern employing mixed meter. But everything will work out fine if the other verse matches the same idiosyncrasies, line for line. Once a composer finds the key to scoring the first verse, the second one should work out just the same with no adjustments to the melody or rhythm.
Now, a lot of people who write lyrics ask questions about how they should decide on meter, syllable count, etc. I say you can do anything, just as long as you keep the pattern you wrote consistent. You don't really have to think in terms of meter or syllable count...you just need to be consistent with whatever rhythmic pattern you have started. As long as that is somewhat consistent, a composer can trust that Line 3 of verse 1 will have the same internal rhythm as Line 3 of Verse 2.
Figured this might make for some good discussion...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,649
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,649 |
Mark,
A very interesting post. And I agree with you completely. As long as the pattern is consistent throughout the song, as you indicated, it's not a problem.
I have written a number of song where the meter of lines 3 & 4 did not match the meter or syllable count of lines 1 & 2. But, I repeated the same pattern in every verse.
Country music seems to be the genre, much more so than other genres, in which the lines are so tightly drawn. I grew up listening to and playing country music, the music we today call Traditional Country. I loved it and still do.
However, it is the formula writing the country business demands that led me to explore gneres other than country. And, for many reasons, I am glad it did. I now write, compose and perform in about a dozen genres and really enjoy all of them.
I still listen to country about half the time. The Contemporary Country is less formula driven that Traditional Country; however, it is still far more formula driven than most other genres.
That may have been a slight diversion from your topic, but they go hand in hand, I think. Also, going back to your initial statement, meter and syllable count need not be perfect because whern the lyric is sung, words can be slurred, held longer, contracted, etc. by the vocalist
Good post, Mark, that touches a lot of my thoughts about songwriting.
Alan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,589 Likes: 1
Top 40 Poster
|
OP
Top 40 Poster
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,589 Likes: 1 |
Thanks Al, I agree with you.
I wrote this because I often read posts from people who only write lyrics (not music) wondering how they should be arranging these lyrics for music. And the answer isn't so simple.
Some people say you should just match your syllable counts: Wrong--without proper attention to natural rhythms, you'll end up stressing words like "and", "but" and "a".
Some say you should always write in some poetic meter: Unnecessary--read some lyrics and you'll find they don't always stick to one meter or another, but rather a mix of meters.
I think whether it's country or anything else, it's hard for a composer to put music to a lyric that keeps changing up it's rhythms from verse to verse. If you're applying lyrics to an existing piece of music, that might work...but if you're writing a lyric that's looking for music, I wouldn't suggest getting too creative with your structure...unless you already know your composer's style pretty well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,195 Likes: 1
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,195 Likes: 1 |
Good point Mark. An example of this that I have been analyzing recently is Taylor Swift's cd "Teardrops on My Guitar." Almost every song is like that. By listening, it is very difficult to determine the exact rhyming line patter she is using. The cadence changes substantilly.
I finally looked at the lyrics and it helped figure out how she did it. There is structure but that structure has lots of variations. The constantly breaks her "rules" of cadence. The rhymes still work and the songs work, because of how she phrases the lyrics and because of the overall sound.
Tom
Last edited by Tom Shea; 08/23/08 12:55 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,463
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,463 |
Good points all round. There are exceptions to every rule but the rules cannot be broken too often. Every song must flow and there are other things to be taken into consideration apart from syllables. The tongue twister syndrom is one that bothers me sometimes. Words that do not flow well together making the line hard to sing. There is also techniques where some short lines can be "stretched" to fit the rythmn and some long looking lines that can be "crammed" into fitting. Funny thing the slow songs seem to have longer lines than the fast songs. You would think it should be the other way round. It amazes me how Country people seem to be fixed on the same rigid formulas and chord structures whereas rock and pop generally accept and have more varied and informal structures.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,831 Likes: 2
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,831 Likes: 2 |
I understand the importance of keeping rhythmic consistency, but I also understand how meter and syllable count need not be perfect because the singer can adjust, as mentioned. But I think I’m a little confused about the difference between rhythm, cadence and meter. Not having a melody in mind (which I usually don’t when I write) I feel like there’s room for the singer to keep it “flowing” (for lack of a better term). But that has to affect the melody, so how do writers take that into consideration when writing? How is the writer to know how that will pan out? Not being a singer myself, I feel handicapped in that area.
Personally, my best gage for whether a line “flows” is if it speaks (“sings”) naturally in the context of the words when heard. I think my best gage for whether all the lines flow from verse to verse is when I read it over as an entire piece, nothing sticks out. I’m sure this is the elementary way of doing things, but I’d love to know how others obtain that “rhythmic consistency.” It’s so hard to tell sometimes without a melody/music.
A musician must make music, an artist must paint, a poet must write, if he is to be ultimately at peace with himself. What a man can be, he must be. -- Abraham Maslow, American Psychologist
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,554
Top 200 Poster
|
Top 200 Poster
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,554 |
Well, one device I use sometimes if I have a line I like, but might prove difficult without a specific way of delivering the words is to develop the phrasing with a unique interval leap to help the words along.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,463
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,463 |
Hi Kristi. You have pretty much summed it up. If a lyric speaks well to a rhythm pattern then it can be put to a tune. IMO the only difference between speaking rhythmically and singing is the notes change. I mostly write lyrics first and then add melody. It is important to tap out the beats as you recite the words and see if it fits. That is meter. If the words do not meter properly then you will have probs setting a tune. When we speak our voice naturally changes tone, pitch and volume to express what we are saying. The art of a good songwriter is to convey these changes in the melody and chord structure. It is very easy to explain but difficult to achieve. LOL
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,831 Likes: 2
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,831 Likes: 2 |
So, interval leaps help "stretch" the line....I can see that.
Big Jim...hey, everything you just said really makes sense to me! ..."the only difference between speaking rhythmically and singing is the notes change." It sounds so simple, doesn't it? Never thought of it like that. So to reiterate what you said, which I totally get now: you say the melody and chord structure is really our pitch and volume and tone when we speak. Yes, that's it, isn't it? Wow. What an awesome explanation...
A musician must make music, an artist must paint, a poet must write, if he is to be ultimately at peace with himself. What a man can be, he must be. -- Abraham Maslow, American Psychologist
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,554
Top 200 Poster
|
Top 200 Poster
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,554 |
It could help stretch the line, but it helps more sometimes when the pronunciation is a bit of a challenge.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,440
Serious Contributor
|
Serious Contributor
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,440 |
I was thinking about lyrics that are written BEFORE there is music composed for them. Some people say a lyric by itself is a poem, but that's not really true. Not true. A lot depends on the definition of poetry, which is basically a manipulation of language for purposes of emphasizing it's aesthetic or evocative properties, including sound and metaphor. A lot of so-called modern poetry does not emphasize the lyrical conventions you find in modern song lyrics (and it still considered poetry) but relies instead on semantics. You can anything that is not standard prose a poem -- it might be a really BAD poem, as the VAST majority are. Just a thought here: I notice in a lot of good songs, the lyrical lines have a bizarre rhythm all their own....not necessarily measured by traditional poetic meter nor by syllable count, but by the line's own peculiar rhythm. You mean its meter. Prosody is the study of poetic meter. This is something that ALL writers should be familiar with but most don't have a clue. Most people think that all you have to do to write a lyric is have a certain number of syllables per line and make sure the final syllable in each line rhymes. As Alexander Pope once said, "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.' The result is volumes and volumes of REALLY BAD POETRY. 99% of the bad poetry you read suffers from problems with meter. Some writers have an internal knowledge of this but most have to learn the rules (and MOST DON'T). The key is the stress patter in each metrical foot (which is a sequence of syllables. strong and weak). Here is some info about this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meter_(poetry) If you area lyricist are are not willing to take a few hours and educate yourself about prosody and meter, you need to stop writing NOW. You can't just trust to syllable count, because rhythms may be different. For example, the following two lines both have six syllables:
Johnny is a rock star I want to suck your blood ...but they clash---they're too different to belong in the same musical phrase:[/quote] The first line consists of three trochaic feet (three strong-weak feet); the second line consists of iambic feet (three weak-strong feet). JOHNny is a ROCK star i WANT to SUCK your BLOOD
And sometimes lyrics employ MIXED meter instead of a long run of say, iambic pentameter that sounds like ta-DA ta-DA ta-DA ta-DA.
Word choice will often affect this. All single words have a default heavy stress, except for pronouns in certain positions.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,463
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,463 |
Hi Kristi. OK now you understand...... but to press the point home try this neat experiment. Pick some of your fav songs.... some happy.... some sad.... some fast.... some slow. Speak the lines without singing. You will see how the song meters and how your voice conveys the feeling of the song. Check the rises and falls in tone and pitch and the slowing or quickening of the phrases to suit the mood. Great songs melody and chord structures just mimic what our voices do naturally.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 232
Serious Contributor
|
Serious Contributor
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 232 |
Great thread!
I've been educating myself about prosody/meter recently, as I feel my lyrics need improving.
A while ago, I bought a copy of "Successful lyric writing - a step by step course and workbook" by Sheila Davis but it's been sitting on my shelf for a few months now. I'm planning on studying it in September, but in the meanwhile, I have also learnt a lot about writing lyrics from "The craft and business of songwriting" by John Brahemy, which is a book I highly recommend.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,589 Likes: 1
Top 40 Poster
|
OP
Top 40 Poster
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,589 Likes: 1 |
Kristi, your question about making sure the melody works---before you know what it is---is exactly what I'm hoping to help with here. Whatever word pattern you set up simply needs to be consistent from verse to verse. Then the melody will fall into place. You need to be able to say your words out loud and feel the natural "beats" of the words. Johnny is a rock star matches ev'ry single hipster or twenty thousand yard lights or pretty little hamster These rhythms we speak (or sing) are like little drum solos. Then here's the different six syllable drum solo: I want to suck your blood or you've got to change your mind or my wallet caught on fire or she's such a silly cat rblight, you're right, "meter" is the word to describe these rhythms, but I want to make sure people can recognize a pattern that is not consistently in one particular poetic meter, something that's "mixed meter" and conversational, and be able to match it with other lyrics. Like this: Tonight you're mine completely You give you love so sweetly Tonight the light of love is in your eyes But will you love me tomorrow? Is this a lasting treasure Or just a moment's pleasure? Can I believe the magic of your sighs? Will you still love me tomorrow? I'd like to know that your love Is love I can be sure of So tell me now, and I won't ask again Will you still love me tomorrow? Or here's a better example of "mixed" meters being matched well: Some nights he'd come in through the old bay window sarcastic smile before it turned to stone His eyes were holding back great waves of anger She stood awhile, but it was time to go Just "feel" the rhythm of words, like little percussion solos.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,831 Likes: 2
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,831 Likes: 2 |
Okay Jim. I found a Billy Joel lyric that I always admired: “We Didn’t Start the Fire.” Now, I’d like to know how well these first few lines of that lyric match. I think they do, of course, even though it’s just a list and not conversational. But it illustrates it, right? The matching rhythmic flow?
HARRY Truman, DORIS Day, RED China, JOHNnie Ray SOUTH Pacific, WALTer Winchell, JOE DiMAGgiO
JOE McCarthy, RICHard Nixon, STUDEbaker, TELEvision NORTH Korea, SOUTH Korea, MARIlyn MonROE
That’s easy to see. It all flows very nicely, even though I would NEVER think that Red China and Studebaker have the same "rhythm!" But these mixed metered ones that you say work, Mark. I tried to accent them to see how they work.
Some NIGHTS he'd COME in THROUGH the OLD bay WINdow sarCAStic SMILE beFORE it TURNed to STONE
His EYES were HOLDing back great WAVES of ANGer She STOOD aWHILE, but IT was TIME to GO
How far off am I? It seems like the top two lines are off because of the “come in” unless “come in” was sung as one word. (If I was writing that, I’d probably change it!) LOL But I can see how a singer could compensate for that.
I’d like to think I’m aware of the rhythmic matching when writing....those little percussion solos...yeah, I see that. All writers should be. But I also think I wouldn’t know for sure if something was off just by the words until the music was applied…cuz the singer can phrase it and sing the little words to accommodate for that, no? I think as words only, you’re limited to some extent. Some lines are more obvious than others to flag!
A musician must make music, an artist must paint, a poet must write, if he is to be ultimately at peace with himself. What a man can be, he must be. -- Abraham Maslow, American Psychologist
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 387
Serious Contributor
|
Serious Contributor
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 387 |
So how do we account for the Kinks singing... "You got me SO i CAN"T sleep AT night" This is an interesting discussion to follow. Most of the posts so far seem to be in agreement, with just different levels of detail provided. I like simple explanations. The ones that suggest we should just write the way we talk...using normal conversational stresses. And making sure that we are consistant matching the verses, line for line, relative to those stresses. At the same time, I really admire the knowledge that's been presented...you guys really have some cool stuff to share.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,633
Top 200 Poster
|
Top 200 Poster
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,633 |
Not true. A lot depends on the definition of poetry, which is basically a manipulation of language for purposes of emphasizing it's aesthetic or evocative properties, including sound and metaphor. A lot of so-called modern poetry does not emphasize the lyrical conventions you find in modern song lyrics (and it still considered poetry) but relies instead on semantics.
You can anything that is not standard prose a poem -- it might be a really BAD poem, as the VAST majority are.
Most people think that all you have to do to write a lyric is have a certain number of syllables per line and make sure the final syllable in each line rhymes. As Alexander Pope once said, "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.' The result is volumes and volumes of REALLY BAD POETRY. 99% of the bad poetry you read suffers from problems with meter.
Most of the REALLY bad poetry I have read is very technically correct.... But has no soul, and is boring as if the writer was so busy showing how clever they are at the mechanics they don't feel the need to actually write about an interesting subject or include any feeling. I've written my share of bad poetry All though I agree that poetry and lryrics come from the same root stock... and often cross over to each others domain, A statement like "Lyrics with out music are just Poems" is like call the Bask, "Spanish". It doesn't make them any less Bask just because they live in Spain. Some people can entertain, make others see hear and feel weather it be with words, music or art. There are some technical aspects that explain why some things work better than others. But in the end a good story is a good story no matter how badly expressed. If you can't tell a good story without it being technically correct... then there is a chance that story telling is not your vocation. If you can't engage and move your target audience no amount of technical ability is going to save you. Yet there are plenty of successfull Musos, singers and writers who really if put under a microscope aren't all that great.. they hit bum notes, use poor grammar and have raspy voices but still people love them ...... The trick is not to lose sight of the forest because of all the trees. Cheers Noel
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
Forums117
Topics125,772
Posts1,161,407
Members21,470
|
Most Online37,523 Jan 25th, 2020
|
|
"Sharing in your success is the payback to those who shared in your failure." -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|