Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18 |
No doubt that somebody good can use BIAB very well and sound very good, but I dont think it's a matter of people just "Accepting" the sound. The average listener rates all music by how it sounds. If you dont sound as full and as vibrant and clean as major artists on the radio, then they dont think you are as good. They may not know why they dont think its as good, they just know that it doesnt sound as good as the music they buy...or steal
To me its not the idea of using samples. Its the idea that no matter what you do, BIAB will only be a nice sounding demo maker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29 |
No doubt that somebody good can use BIAB very well and sound very good, but I dont think it's a matter of people just "Accepting" the sound. The average listener rates all music by how it sounds. If you dont sound as full and as vibrant and clean as major artists on the radio, then they dont think you are as good. They may not know why they dont think its as good, they just know that it doesnt sound as good as the music they buy...or steal
To me its not the idea of using samples. Its the idea that no matter what you do, BIAB will only be a nice sounding demo maker With each day that passes, these software developers are closing the gap between what BIAB will produce and what is produced in a good studio by good people. I disagree with you that an average listener can tell the difference (in many cases) between studio produced tracks and what Michael would produce. I'm not saying that top grade mics and an engineer that has been great with ProTools for years won't be more sophisticated etc...I don't know. But the difference in the resultant sound for many songs, particularly singer-songwriter stuff, won't be perceptible to an average listener....imo. Martin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
OP
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
No doubt that somebody good can use BIAB very well and sound very good, but I dont think it's a matter of people just "Accepting" the sound. The average listener rates all music by how it sounds. If you dont sound as full and as vibrant and clean as major artists on the radio, then they dont think you are as good. They may not know why they dont think its as good, they just know that it doesnt sound as good as the music they buy...or steal
To me its not the idea of using samples. Its the idea that no matter what you do, BIAB will only be a nice sounding demo maker Hi James, Keep in mind BIAB consists of several thousands of performances, and these are mostly competently performed by excellent session musicians such as Brent Mason and John Jarvis on the country side. These are not phoned in performances, either. So how can having top flight Nashville musicians on one's country demo be a bad thing? The key to BIAB, like any software, is..you have to tweak it and tweak it to really get something good out of it. The band may be in the box, as it were, but it's not gonna sound great 'til you do a lot of picking and choosing, cross-fading one performance with another, using polyphonic pitch correction tools like Melodyne to actually bend and morph performances into what the user is envisioning. Vision is still what makes (non-experimental based) art good art. Without it, BIAB sucks. With it, it's an important tool in one's toolbox, and can assist in the creation of wonderful demos. Having said all this, I still think BIAB works best with background tracks and soloists. It can't for instance, echo a song's primary melody, unless you get lucky. Virtual and real instruments work best in those instances. Mike
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 04/21/17 01:50 PM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
OP
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
Hi Martin, Been thinking about your harbinger post. Haven't economy and efficiency always been an important part in the thought process of inventors and creators and toolmakers of all kinds? Aesthetically at least, there's an urge towards economy in the act of inventing and creating and tool-making, and this seems to encompass creating/inventing tools/tech that do what used to take many people to do--ie making tools/tech more efficient. I think there's a deeply rooted creative urge towards this. One thing I'm pretty sure about. We can't "dumb down" our creators and inventors. And pressing a "reset button" only works in Damon Lindeloff run shows like Lost. I like to think that the future will involve some kind of "reverse social entropy" where technology may make many jobs extinct, but that there will be other work, and if not, this will be an area where some creative think-tankers can and must apply their minds. What you present is a true world class ethical dilemma, for sure. Something to keep in mind as we enter the future day by day. Mike
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 04/21/17 03:08 PM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18 |
Martin the average listener probably can't tell any kind of software is being used, but it's never going to sound what radio artists are using for their hit song releases.
If a band in a box recording went between a hit by Taylor Swift , and a hit by green day on the radio, it would sound like an auto jingle
It's not to knock biab or anyone using it, but to think plopping down a few hundred bucks on band in a box, and it can rival what hundreds of thousands of dollars can sound like is not realistic.
Last edited by sjames17; 04/21/17 07:53 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18 |
Michael, that's exactly what I'm saying, that the software works best as an accompaniment for soloists and people wanting to practice. That is what it was originally designed for, as a backing band for blues and jazz musicians
As a guitar player, it always sounded like elevator music to me. Using real instruments with it helps it a bit
But you are right, it's not great for playing melody or supporting melody, it just plays chords. It doesn't know your song, it only spews out some basic supporting chords over your melody. I think you can now change voicing of chords, which helps it sound a bit reader, but it's still generic stuff, it has to be, In order to accommodate millions of users.
The real test is recording covers with it. When you try to record a cover, you soon realize how limited it is. You may end up recording all the unique parts of the song yourself, with biab just filling in the fullness of it
When doing originals, it's easy to pretend that the arrangements are part of your song, but that is because nobody knows your song yet, and they accept what they hear as part of your song.
Again, I think band in a box is great for practice and great for demos and great for lyricists who may not have a lot of musical ability, but I just don't see it as a professional album producer
Last edited by sjames17; 04/21/17 08:04 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29 |
Hi Martin, Been thinking about your harbinger post. Haven't economy and efficiency always been an important part in the thought process of inventors and creators and toolmakers of all kinds? Aesthetically at least, there's an urge towards economy in the act of inventing and creating and tool-making, and this seems to encompass creating/inventing tools/tech that do what used to take many people to do--ie making tools/tech more efficient. I think there's a deeply rooted creative urge towards this. One thing I'm pretty sure about. We can't "dumb down" our creators and inventors. And pressing a "reset button" only works in Damon Lindeloff run shows like Lost. I like to think that the future will involve some kind of "reverse social entropy" where technology may make many jobs extinct, but that there will be other work, and if not, this will be an area where some creative think-tankers can and must apply their minds. What you present is a true world class ethical dilemma, for sure. Something to keep in mind as we enter the future day by day. Mike Westworld seems to mainly be about when artificial intelligence and emotion transcends into actual intelligence and emotion. This robotics convergence seems different. I don't think that anyone should tell people not to innovate or to hold their innovations off the market. That seems a deprivation of freedom and a stillborn idea. In the last two hundred years innovation has come fast and many occupations were made obsolete. But, there is something different looking about this software/robotics/internet convergence. It is coming on real fast and has a wide breadth. Trains, cars and airplanes eliminated the horse and coach industry but created the need for miles of rails and paved roads. Robotics and mechanization and the internet, so far, look like they are going to replace humans at many existing tasks, but not create anything else for the displaced to do. One wonders if the unemployment rate is going to soar in the next twenty years. I'm reading about suggestions such as giving every human being a living stipend out of the profits that machines generate. Maybe it will all be fine, but if you have multitudes of people without incomes and desperate...bad things happen.
Last edited by Martin Lide; 04/21/17 09:02 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29 |
Martin the average listener probably can't tell any kind of software is being used, but it's never going to sound what radio artists are using for their hit song releases.
If a band in a box recording went between a hit by Taylor Swift , and a hit by green day on the radio, it would sound like an auto jingle
It's not to knock biab or anyone using it, but to think plopping down a few hundred bucks on band in a box, and it can rival what hundreds of thousands of dollars can sound like is not realistic. I disagree. I think BIAB or something similar will be indistinguishable in the hands of someone like Mike in just a few years. I know how to use recording software a little bit and sort of. I know how to use architectural software well. In my lifetime I've watched it become a curiosity and then a substitute for drafting and then a magnificent tool capable of all sorts of things. Now I'm watching it evolve into a magnificent tool that can employ itself. Music is on the same track.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
OP
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
James, The accompaniment performances DO NOT just play chords. They add in all kinds of non-chordal notes: passing tones, lower and upper neighboring tones, grace notes, appoggiaturas, etc. BIAB has always considered non-chordal tones as part of what makes up a given style, and so every style has plenty of non-chordal tones that will happen in any given accompaniment, and over any given chord. But of course, you want the BIAB performers to be following your chart, and these performances sound like real musicians with their own quirks and predilections and riffs because they ARE real musicians with their own quirks and predilections and riffs, and the performances are far from vanilla, though I suppose this point may be a matter of subjective opinion. I wouldn't want to tell John Jarvis or Kenny Barron that their BIAB performances were vanilla, though, because they are pretty sweet, actually. These guys (and all the BIAB musicians) did for BIAB what they do in ANY session situation: they follow a chart and put their personalities into it, and they don't play safe or hold back. Maybe you have an image in your head of what BIAB was about ten years ago. BIAB has been using real performances from real world class musicians since about 2009. These performances are committed to high quality audio formats and all told there's almost two terabytes of audio (with the Audiophile version) or about 2,600 hours, laid out end-to-end. This is the equivalent of having hundreds of great session musicians at your disposal. Strike that. This IS having hundreds of great session musicians at your disposal. And if not, it's the next best thing. The one point we are in agreement is that for a foregrounded melody that echoes a melody in ones' song, BIAB will be clueless--because it's not a mind-reader--it never claimed to be a fully functional digital audio workstation. But at this point it, with a little smoke-and-mirrors and elbow grease, can certainly be one of the pillars upon which one produces great tracks. Combined with real instruments, virtual instruments, and an artistic vision--you're set. Mike
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 04/21/17 11:41 PM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
OP
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
Westworld seems to mainly be about when artificial intelligence and emotion transcends into actual intelligence and emotion.
And it's a great hook. The best thing about Star Trek TNG (other than Patrick Stewart's great elocution) was the character of Data. We are to artificial intelligence what God is to man. I cannot, at this point claim to think that AI will never achieve sentience, and wonder what that will ultimately mean. As to Westworld, waiting two whole years for season two is gonna be hard. Delores, Delores, Delores.. (shaking my head in disbelief..) Mike
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18 |
Martin dont get me wrong, I think AI WILL change the game, and in some ways already has.
I think our generation and probably the next will be ok for our music endeavors, but beyond that...I have been loathing this idea for a while now
I just don't think we are there yet, this stuff is still in its infancy. Imagine wearing a head band, that has electrodes, you simply think a bass line, and it comes through the electors, into a daw, and then you just choose what bass, what sound, and it plays what your brain was thinking?
Now THAT would be cool. I'm not as excited about machines doing all,the creative stuff though
Anyway,we can agree to disagree on band in a box.
Last edited by sjames17; 04/21/17 11:54 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18 |
Michael, what I meant was the software doesn't play to you, you have to play to it. It plays riffs and passing melodies, but it's not made for your song
Two people can release two different songs, and you both could end up with the same bass line. It would take more than a thousand possibilities, the human mind has millions, and it grows
its probably the best thing we have for that cost and practicality but it's not a replacement for real musicians.
Drums seem to be fine, I have ex drummer and I can get Ez drummer to play exactly what I want it to play, I can't do that with other instruments.
The other thing to consider is if you are going to devote that much time into making band in a box a detailed music accompaniment and doing all,the things you mentioned, you could argue that learning to actually play the other Instruments would be as easy!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
OP
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
Michael, what I meant was the software doesn't play to you, you have to play to it. It plays riffs and passing melodies, but it's not made for your song
Two people can release two different songs, and you both could end up with the same bass line. It would take more than a thousand possibilities, the human mind has millions, and it grows
its probably the best thing we have for that cost and practicality but it's not a replacement for real musicians.
Drums seem to be fine, I have ex drummer and I can get Ez drummer to play exactly what I want it to play, I can't do that with other instruments.
The other thing to consider is if you are going to devote that much time into making band in a box a detailed music accompaniment and doing all,the things you mentioned, you could argue that learning to actually play the other Instruments would be as easy!
James, For exactitude, I would never use BIAB. When I want specific melodic lines, I wouldn't use BIAB. In fact, a third of my time is spent writing soundtrack kinda stuff for music libraries, and I never use BIAB for that stuff. As to "playing to you" vs. "you playing to it." When dealing with accompaniment, most of the time one is not gonna want the session musicians to be playing any more "to you" than they do in a given style. You choose a style of performance, and that is usually "to you" enough. If I want a musician quoting a singers' melody a bar later, like I say, I wouldn't use BIAB for that. Wrong choice of tool. If you had Native Instruments' Kontakt you would find that the world of virtual instruments has improved significantly as well. Every instrument under the sun potentially at your fingertips, sampled deeply, and with the scripting you never hear a "machine-gun effect" of repeated notes. I was a guitarist for over thirty-five years. I hurt my chording hand thumb from busking 5-8 hour days out at Balboa Park. Must've been pushing my thumb too hard into the neck, LOL. I miss Travis picking especially.. No, it's not a replacement for real musicians but it is the next best thing, since you are getting many hours of performances from each (real session musician) that you can be creative with. It's really a great tool. Mike
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 04/22/17 02:46 AM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18 |
Man that sucks about your thumb, sorry to hear that, that's a tragedy for a musician.
Well, I think the specific parts/melodies is what makes the arrangements great. Like the guitar is playing a half chord with a melody, and then the bass comes in and slides down to a higher octave, and hits the third of the chord, then plays its own little melody before the singer sings the next line.
Meanwhile the piano tinkles to a higher range so to not clutter that range of the arrangement, while the sax plays a few wailing harmonies of what the guitar might be doing.
I mean I may not have described that very well, but there is nothing like an arrangement that is working together to create a great track.
Last edited by sjames17; 04/22/17 12:50 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
OP
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
Man that sucks about your thumb, sorry to hear that, that's a tragedy for a musician.
Well, I think the specific parts/melodies is what makes the arrangements great. Like the guitar is playing a half chord with a melody, and then the bass comes in and slides down to a higher octave, and hits the third of the chord, then plays its own little melody before the singer sings the next line.
Meanwhile the piano tinkles to a higher range so to not clutter that range of the arrangement, while the sax plays a few wailing harmonies of what the guitar might be doing.
I mean I may not have described that very well, but there is nothing like an arrangement that is working together to create a great track.
Yeah, it's like getting electrical shocks down the base of my thumb whenever I press it against the neck. Nerve damage. Well there's nothing wrong with a Brian Wilson kinda control over arrangements. In fact if you hear all that stuff, go for it. But the thing I've learned about making demos, for clients especially, is that oft times they don't desire too much detail put into instrumental parts that are supposed to be background accompaniment, cuz they distract from the singer and the song. Most of the time, my clients want their lyrics and melody front and center. Besides, the (BIAB) session players "know" the style I've chosen for them and play "to it" quite well. Most of the time I mix styles together, and this will comprise 60-70% of an arrangement, with virtual and real instruments comprising the rest--usually foregrounded stuff. There's often foregrounded music going on in any given song at any given point, whether we're talking fills or counterpoint, and for this stuff virtual instruments get the call, especially if I'm quoting the songs' melody. So I usually end up doing much detailed work on any given demo, but use the "listener can only follow one thing at a time" approach. I can understand the enjoyment of detail and control like you describe, but find the human ear can only really hear one thing at a time (though as a listener, I love free jazz). The trick is to always, magician-like, be leading the listener to be hearing what you want them to with a musical sleight-of-hand. Mike
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 04/22/17 02:52 AM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18 |
People hear a wall of sound, they hear specifics only subconciously. The end result is the melody stands out because of everything going on around it. if you arranged a pop song like a grateful dead song, you would have people tuning out
playing f# in the bass of a d chord changes the whole dynamic of the chord. playing the root of everything and the same voicing gets boring.
You couldnt compete with pop radio using band in a box arrangements, but you can get solid results.
I remember in music appreciation class they used to make us listen to one part only of a song, and you hear say the bass line as never heard before, alone. alone it often sounds like nothing, mixed with everything else it sounds great
One time I was getting my tires changed at this garage, and the garage was big and boomy, walk this way came on, and i was tuned into the bass line
The bass line is freaking great! but youd never notice it if not listening directly for it, but when listening to a song you hear it all as one sound
Give it a try, the bass is so cool on aersosmiths walk this way!
Last edited by sjames17; 04/22/17 11:25 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18 |
lets say you wrote Sir Duke. How in the world could you get band in a box to play all this? (they may actually have a preset version of sir duke in band in a box, but thats different, here you are trying to arrange your song from scratch using band in a box https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6fPN5aQVDI
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 18 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
OP
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
Like I said, BIAB is not the tool of choice when specific melodies, riffs, etc. are in mind, unless you know certain BIAB performances will give you that. But with the music meant as background, you don't want it to distract too much--that foregrounds it to some extent. If I write something really clever for a virtual musician playing in the background, clients often ask me to simplify. It's important to decide what is background and what is foreground, in any given piece. With foregrounded stuff, you basically, usually, just want one thing at a time to be foregrounded (the singer when they're singing), otherwise it can be distracting. When speaking in generalities one has to be careful, cuz there are always countless exceptions, though, such as riffs and grooves that run through pieces.
Most recording sessions involving good session players involve them playing using only a chord chart. Most of the time they are not reading an exact musical score that they must reproduce note for note, but interpreting things themselves, the best they can, unless they've been given discreet instructions. So how is this situation different from BIAB? Here's how..in real life, Stevie Wonder might chime in by singing relevant parts to the various guys, but when those parts aren't happening (in the song) the session players more than likely "default" back to playing what they feel. And this is where, in home studio recording, you say "the best tool for this Sir Dukish part is not BIAB but my virtual clavinet (or whatever) and I will write this part out, note for note, using Kontakt's clavinet, but for the "default" stuff, I'll use BIAB.
Sometimes in a real life recording session, a player will do something, on his own that you like, and you say, "hey, do that again..let's use that!" This is an ongoing happy accident in BIAB. My point being, even though BIAB can't give a specific melody (wrong tool) --it can and often will surprise with something delightful that sticks..just like in real life, in a real live recording session, with session players you trust to add their own input into a chart--if one is open to that in a studio situation. You site this as a negative thing, but it's not. It's often the correct tool--especially for parts meant as background. Well played stuff, but not so idiosyncratic that they are distracting and becoming foreground by there very idiosyncratic nature.
We are talking apples and oranges a bit, I think. BIAB is not the right tool when specific melodies are in mind. But often when making demos, and even when creating full-on final versions, one doesn't need to thoroughly compose every note for every part. Usually that's just for foregrounded stuff. Fills and counter-melodies, intros, outros, and solos..but I must say the latest iteration of BIAB has a lot of tasty playing that I'm using for fills at the moment..the dobro work is especially exceptional..
Mike
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 04/22/17 06:29 PM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12 |
I dont mind BIAB, it's just there will always be a great amount of "settling" or "good enough" going on.
A human session musician is there playing with the music, and they are usually such pros that whatever they play is perfect for the song, semi composing the song as they record.
I know you are saying specific parts is not for BIAB, but how much does BIAB add to your song just playing safe melodies and chords
Last edited by tanell59; 04/29/17 04:19 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,831
Top 30 Poster
|
Top 30 Poster
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,831 |
Hi Mike and fellow Threadsters:
This has been an interesting "set of conversations" to say the least. A couple of the early posts implied, "Whatever Works!" and I'm pretty much a part of that camp. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have the talent of Andres Segovia... or Mozart (yeah, I know there were more than one... LOL!) but being old and arthritic has limitations. My theory is: If it sounds good to my ears... that's as good as it gets. If you are capable of milking subtle nuances out of a kazoo and your "hit single" is flying off the virtual shelves of Internet Record Shops... isn't that all that matters. I loved John's early example of hunting and skinning the goat in order to create your own drum-skins... for the sake of authenticity.
As a songwriter, I am an untrained vocalist and would-be musician. I do the best I can with what I have to work with, knowing full well that someone else might take my song to heights I never could even imagine. That is precisely what I seek. Song creating is not about me (other than I'd like one of those money making hit-singles or albums... or live performances that get the gold in my grubby little grips) but merely conveying a somewhat musical and lyrical idea... a song.
Many of us here at JPF are songwriters. Others are only lyricists. Few are Singer/songwriter/musician rolled into one complete package. What a remarkable gift that would be... but, in my defense, I have a musical inner-being and I appreciate good music and songs. (Don't we all?) Naturally, each of us will be tuned to a different frequency when it comes to musical tastes.
To me, there is no "argument" here. If you like what you hear, buy it! LOL!
Thanks, Mike... for all you have brought to the JPF community. Your demos and creativity are remarkable.
----Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12 |
Mike can make very solid recordings, my opinion of biab doesn't discredit his work, no need to go to bat for him.
There is a big difference between demo and radio ready recordings.
I enjoy listening to stripped down stuff just as much as full throttle stuff.
but the average fan of music and buyer of music compares it to the best productions out there. If Taylor swift did her own demo in her room, using biab, she would not get radio play with it or sell much, maybe some curious fans would buy it, but there is a standard a recording must meet to receieve air play, although internet radio has a lower standard
It's not a knock of anyone or anything, not many people have 100 grand or more to spend on a song
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,831
Top 30 Poster
|
Top 30 Poster
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,831 |
Hi tanell59:
To my way of thinking, your last line says it all. Prior to that, you mentioned Taylor Swift. Successful and talented as she may be, I don't buy her songs regardless of the degree of "production" backing. Compared to other artists in her genre (Teen Pop to me) she is the crème-de-la-crème... but only to those who buy her music. I respect her and regret the recent trend she seems to be following.
A friend once chided me about the way I create songs. "That's cheating!" he exclaimed. My reply: Did Frank Sinatra also write the music and lead the orchestra?
Your point about "air play" rings a bit hollow simply because big box stations only play from the playlist provided by the "mothership." It isn't about taste... it's all about money. Little box stations won't allow wannabees airplay because they fear copyright infringement, etc.
On the other side of the coin... there are artists who practically sing acapella or with minimal backing and they sound just as great in the genre they serve as those backed by the Mormon Tabernacle Choir... LOL! Remember the young black girl artist (Tracy something) who took the airwaves and record shops by storm with her plain spoken, honest vocals? I'm thinking it was back in the 80's but fading memory cells and pure laziness prevent me from researching further.
No matter, my friend. We are each entitled to our opinions... and before I forget... "Welcome to JPF!" ----Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12 |
Yes Dave, I'm not a big fan of Taylor Swift either, that's not the point. The point is there's no Grammy, there's no album sales, there's no radio play, there's no millions of fans, etc, if not for top of the line production on her recordings.
whether you like Willie Nelson, Taylor Swift, Prince, Gren day, or any huge artist out there, you are getting the best recording money has to buy.
The point is band in a box has never been used on a major artists recording, and never will. There is no reason to, a 200 dollar software will never sound like a tens of thousands of dollars recording. Not never ever!
Your point about radio playing what they want to play is irrelevant, if you were looking to get on radio, youdhave zero chance using band in a box, whether they wanted to play your music or not.
I think the home recording industry has pulled the wool over artists eyes. No matter what you do with home gear, even stuff way better than biab, you can't compete with pro engineers, pro musicians, pro producers, pro arrangers.
Go and listen to the demos on biab website, if you hear one that sounds comparable to what's on the radio, let me know which.
You can compete with underground musicians. Lower budget diy friendly station and websites.
Last edited by tanell59; 04/29/17 06:05 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,831
Top 30 Poster
|
Top 30 Poster
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,831 |
Hi again, Mr. T:
Interesting argument. (I'm using the term "argument" as one would use it in a court of law.) My response is one I cannot prove. Simply put, if I were soaking in ready cash (millions) and decided to "promote" a talented and popular BIAB artist, I believe I could get him/her serious airplay... given the fact that payola survives even today. (Again, I would be hard-pressed to prove that, LOL! but everyone believes it still exists.)
Too many folks buy music without having any music appreciation of any description. In those cases, most are looking for violent and disgusting "lyrics" written with the attitude and intelligence of a three year old. I believe ASCAP sent us a pie chart showing how one-sided this market is today in comparison to the other genres.
Thanks for sharing your opinion. It's always good to know what others believe.
----Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12 |
If you were soaking in millions, you wouldn't be using biab, or promoting somebody who uses it.
Lol, well I'm glad you don't take it as a fight, cause it's not one.
Most of us get by with what we have, necessity is the mother of invention.
It all depends what your genre is, if your genre is low fidelity rock, you can make recordings that rival some of the greats of yesteryear with modest home gear.
If trying to top the charts,that's not gonna happen
But as long as we are happy with our results, that's most important. most of us are not ever going to find out whether or not biab can compete with err.... Fall out boy....
Last edited by tanell59; 04/29/17 07:25 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,916 Likes: 9
Top 40 Poster
|
Top 40 Poster
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,916 Likes: 9 |
Biab is meant for demos. If you can make a decent demo with biab and some A&R man thinks he can improve on it, what's wrong with that?
I hear that most pro studios use loops now and use musicians for hooky riffs.
Vic
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29 |
If Taylor swift did her own demo in her room, using biab, she would not get radio play with it or sell much, maybe some curious fans would buy it, but there is a standard a recording must meet to receieve air play, although internet radio has a lower standard
g Wrong. Depending on the song, her fans would love it. You could give Adele's piano player a good midi and BIAB or many other softwares and the two of them could put out a recording of "Make You Feel My love" that would work...and raise no flags. Not in five years but right now. With the money that she has behind her...why skimp? but with her massive talent, she could do a compelling recording on several songs that her fans would love, as would Taylor's. Beyonce's dad has a studio a mile from my house. Used to get a good deal on time down there. Used a sound guy named Nino who did some Beyonce tracks as well as her sisters. Four years ago, he said that people at that level were supplying music, to him, for them, done with a midi. I didn't interrogate him about it, so I don't know all the details but that's what I recall him saying. Heard a tennis player say once..."People bitch about their racquet not being this and not being that....but a good tennis player can beat a bad tennis player with a coke bottle." True in music and a lot of things.
Last edited by Martin Lide; 04/30/17 01:37 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12 |
Nothing wrong with that @Vic, that's exactly what it's for. Well not exactly, it's exact,y for musicians to practice their jamming and copping skills on blues and jazz tunes.
But it's a great scratch maker, I have no arguments about that
Last edited by tanell59; 04/30/17 12:58 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12 |
@ Martin, I said Taylor's fans might buy out of curiosity, and allow her to make a stripped down album, they did it for Springsteen on Nebraska, which he recorded all acoustic on a tascam 4 track, and mind you, if not for the top notch songwriting, it would have been a chit listen. Tons of noise and hiss, and no volume out of it. But it's consideed a great low fi album, because of the songwriting.
Having said that, if Taylor Swift didn't have any fans yet, and the record company says, hey I like this kid, let's sign her, and release her first album using band In a box tracks...well safe to say we wouldn't be hearing from her again
I have heard and can paste recordings from Pete Townshend, Paul Simon, John Mellancamp, I could post their demos of famous songs. And they sound fantastic, even stripped down and lower fi, With real instruments, Townshend playing drums bass and keys himself, but they knew that they couldn't release them as is, they had to redo them. That's what demos are for
I wish somebody famous would show up and settle this for us. I'm thinkin Eric Clapton would giggle at the idea of using biab for an album, but I bet he'd think it was great for practicing the blues,
Last edited by tanell59; 04/30/17 01:09 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29 |
Tanell...believe what you like. Technology is moving incredibly fast. Leave a little space in your psyche for seeing this wrong.
And have your spiei lined up for why you were actually right..people just misunderstood what you said.
Thats a page out of economic forecasting. May come in handy for you.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12 |
Vic didn't misunderstand what I said, and this guy does very well with band in a box. Nobody said it sucks, I said it's not nowhere near what hit songs sound like. I dont know how you can argue that
I have no doubt that tech is going to improve but we were discussing band in a box, and whether or not It can be used to cut a major artists album.
Ask some of th Nashville guys here, guy who try to write for Nashville, ask them what the labels and publishers want these days, they want a recording so good that the singer just needs to sing over it, ready for commercial radio.
But we'll leave it alone
Last edited by tanell59; 04/30/17 01:34 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29 |
Got it. Still suggest that you leave a little room for error on this. Just a little.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,652
Top 200 Poster
|
Top 200 Poster
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,652 |
A large percentage of the hip-hop community has done quite well using loops with no “real” musicians. Same thing with techno. I found it funny that The Who’s “Who are You” was used as an example of what BIAB can’t do. The songs intro riff is a synth “playing itself”. The band then played along to it. Keyboard players use MIDI and various sound triggers all the time both live and recorded. Playing in bands all my life, I consider myself a musician, and I love BIAB. Using it as an extension to what I can already play, it’s awesome. It’s like anything else, the more you know about it, the better results you will have. I have no problem putting BIAB recordings up on the web or sending them out as demos. Much easier than getting the whole band together to record and the sound, to me, is acceptable. Would I release a CD of my original songs using all BIAB? No! Here’s a link of me using BIAB to record some well known Beatle and ELO cover songs. Keep in mind I use BIAB more to back up what I can’t play. http://www.badbetsy.com/covers/Good discussion….Carry on!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
OP
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
Cool article! I used to joke that one day there will be software that can take a recorded singing voice and with the press of a button, change it into one sounding like (among others) Bob Dylan's.. I think this is all good. What's wrong with the "act of composing" including the idea of "choosing" between various permutations that a modern piece of algorithmic compositional software may spew out? Aren't we doing that anyway? Choosing between various things when we compose? Perhaps at a more subatomic, subconscious level, but "choosing" all the same. One fun thing I've been doing since the eighties is to take a midi file and literally flip it upside down, and then listen. This transforms any song into a completely different song, sometimes a more interesting, less cliched composition than the original. Major chords become minor and vice versa, chord changes up a fourth become down a fourth, etc.
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 05/27/17 02:14 PM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,125 Likes: 29 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,242
Top 200 Poster
|
Top 200 Poster
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,242 |
If you can spend some time with this u-tube video -you will hear the amazing sound creation that this sound track composer is able to pull out of tiny bits of sound using a newer technique called granular synthesis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35hDHgH_fdA
Last edited by PeteG; 09/28/17 11:08 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,579 Likes: 13
Top 10 Poster
|
Top 10 Poster
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,579 Likes: 13 |
If you can spend some time with this u-tube video -you will hear the amazing sound creation that this sound track composer is able to pull out of tiny bits of sound using a newer technique called granular synthesis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35hDHgH_fdAIn the right hands, very rudimentary gear can sound better than a lesser talent with all the money, gear and facilities you can imagine. Talent usually wins the day no matter what gear is being used.
Brian Austin Whitney Founder Just Plain Folks jpfolkspro@gmail.com Skype: Brian Austin Whitney Facebook: www.facebook.com/justplainfolks"Don't sit around and wait for success to come to you... it doesn't know the way." -Brian Austin Whitney "It's easier to be the bigger man when you actually are..." -Brian Austin Whitney "Sometimes all you have to do to inspire humans to greatness is to give them a reason and opportunity to do something great." -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,242
Top 200 Poster
|
Top 200 Poster
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,242 |
I thought the producer of this video showed both talent and imagination to produce some very usable sounds that could be adapted to, (and maybe with some development) become part of a soundtrack. I felt he explained his steps, and it was beyond my understanding, but basically he created them out of bits of sound that he had written and recorded previously. And it was a live experiment, though he was thankfully able to run his equipment well, I thought. In some way similar to dropping a stylus on a spinning record, but the record is spinning at a very slow speed and the stylus is listening intently.
I'm not sure talent always wins the day, or if it should even be about winning and losing, but a good voice is a good voice , and a good mic produces a good voice, but a great mic makes a good voice sound great, and on down the production line. Pete
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
Forums117
Topics125,714
Posts1,160,942
Members21,470
|
Most Online37,523 Jan 25th, 2020
|
|
"If one man can do it, any man can do it. It is true. But the real question is, if one man did it, are you willing to do what it takes to do it as well?" –Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|