10 members (Fdemetrio, VNORTH2, Gary E. Andrews, Perry Neal Crawford, couchgrouch, Sunset Poet, Guy E. Trepanier, bennash, Bill Draper, David Gill),
4,088
guests, and
270
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,210
Top 50 Poster
|
OP
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,210 |
This may be a silly question, but I am going to ask it.
If someone was to collaborate on a song, and one person did the lyrics, and the other did the music to those lyrics, if one or the other party wanted to pitch the MUSIC ONLY from that song to for a commercial or something, could that be done or does the music belong to the person who wrote the music and not the lyric writer? Of course I am asking if the music was picked up, who would have rights to the earnings?
I hope my question makes sense and maybe the answer is staring me in the face but I am asking anyways..
Kim
Last edited by KimberlyinNC; 05/03/12 08:12 PM.
*Always open to collaborations on my lyrics.. with singers and musicians, but PLEASE contact me before putting work into one--in case someone else has it..thanks!!** BMI Member All Rights Reserved http://www.littleikepublishing.com Email for Song Business Only littleikeproductions@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,670 Likes: 2
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,670 Likes: 2 |
Kim, my collaborations are always 50/50, irrespective of whether the song is pitched as is, as an instrumental, or - unlikely, but one never knows - simply in lyric form. In every case, any royalties are to be shared equally. This is based on the premise that the song as such would never have come into existence without either the music or the lyrics. I've spoken to professionals about this (including MAB), and this seems to be the consensus. I hope this helps. Donna Afterthought re lyrics: an exception might be if someone had seen the lyrics on their own somewhere, and not in connection with music at all.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 386 Likes: 3
Top 500 Poster
|
Top 500 Poster
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 386 Likes: 3 |
The answer isn't so simple as it seems, example: I have an instrumental placed at Youlicense.com and sold some licenses for it's use, then someone who heard that instrumental at dance school(they bought a license) wanted to make a song with it adding their lyrics, so what, if I'll agree then that person has rights for my instrumental? I think no, the only case if approved by both parties when final product is in use as a complete song with a melody and lyrics then each collaborator can use it for commercial purposes. I think this is right, otherwise any other cases should be put in writing i.e. AGREEMENT between parties. Still music attorney opinion is required.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,911 Likes: 1
Top 30 Poster
|
Top 30 Poster
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,911 Likes: 1 |
The music is a part of the song that you have jointly created. If the song is placed but only the music is used, the songwriters share the rewards in the proportion agreed to - probably 50-50. Sweet Home Alabama is still Sweet Home Alabama even when nobody is singin!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,831
Top 30 Poster
|
Top 30 Poster
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,831 |
I'm no music attorney but I suspect this question bears some careful consideration. A lyric is a lyric only without a melody. A melody is only a melody (and I think that is what Kimberly is questioning) without a lyric. Once the two are "joined" the resultive work is a song.
The proceeds of the song are shared by the co-writers (lyricist and composer) in that given song. When a melody is played or performed without the lyrics... and recorded... I suspect it is possible for the proceeds to be channelled only to the composer unless a specific written agreement is in place between the two parties. Let's see what our "in-house" music barristers or attorneys will tell us about this interesting question.
Just another reason I keep telling MAB that it's better for the songwriter to be both, the lyricist and the composer... LOL! Oh, by the way, no matter if it's a song or a composition/melody... half the proceeds normally go to the publisher and the remaining half is divided between the creators. (They call this process "The Splits.") Naturally, people with star quality are sometimes able to negotiate the percentages between creator(s) and the publisher... if they are not one and the same... like the Beatles ended up being. Smart cookies, these Brits!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,579 Likes: 13
Top 10 Poster
|
Top 10 Poster
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,579 Likes: 13 |
Once you start a co-write process, the two pieces are locked together and can't be simply extracted to work with someone else without express permission of the original co-writer. As for licensing songs, be VERY careful with what language is in that agreement. I would never suggest EVER licensing something without your own attorney looking it over and explaining to you what can and cannot happen to your music going forward.
Folks, be very careful out there! These sites and their agreements are really dangerous.
Brian
Brian Austin Whitney Founder Just Plain Folks jpfolkspro@gmail.com Skype: Brian Austin Whitney Facebook: www.facebook.com/justplainfolks"Don't sit around and wait for success to come to you... it doesn't know the way." -Brian Austin Whitney "It's easier to be the bigger man when you actually are..." -Brian Austin Whitney "Sometimes all you have to do to inspire humans to greatness is to give them a reason and opportunity to do something great." -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 854
Top 500 Poster
|
Top 500 Poster
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 854 |
Im not sure if I was the only one to pick up on how your worded the question, but, if the music is pitched by itself, without the lyrics, and somebody picks up the music, I dont see how the lyricist has any claim.
If the song was pitched as a whole with music and lyric together, and the company only wanted the music, then the lyricist could probably claim something.
But if u pitch music alone, that same music could have had a lyric written to it, like the case in a challenge, and maybe 10 different lyrics were written for that music at one time or another, I dont think all ten lyricists would have a claim if the music was pitched by itself.
So neither would one, in that case.
Also prolly comes down to if the song was officially copyrighted with one music writer and one lyricist.
But I could be wrong, thats just my hunch.
Last edited by December Rock Star; 05/07/12 04:19 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30 |
A 50/50 split arrangement with a collaborator isn't always so cut and dry...
I composed a creepy version of Silent Night (titled Haunted Night). This instrumental track was already signed non-exclusively with a library when a lyricist wanted to add lyrics to my original track (narrative lyrics). I've already received licensing fees for this track long before this lyricist got involved.
This was fine with me, but I consider both versions as separate tracks. In fact, I had her re-title the new version to "Silent Night, Haunted Night". My "Haunted Night" remains mine 100%, while the new version "Silent Night, Haunted Night" is a 50/50 collaboration split.
On the other hand, I composed a song with another lyricist. This song was just signed with an exclusive library. The exclusive library also wanted a piano solo version of this song (which I made). I consider both of these versions as a 50/50 split with the lyricist.
A time frame of events dictates the agreement in my examples.
John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 386 Likes: 3
Top 500 Poster
|
Top 500 Poster
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 386 Likes: 3 |
John, your case is almost the same as mine that I mentioned above, so, main point, as for me, is: let's put everything in writing! Really, if we already licensed our tunes as instrumentals (I did it exactly), so, why we should split income that those instrumentals are generating with somebody else? Another thing is complete song with a lyrics. Well, I'm going to ask this question at linkedin.com groups - there are music attorneys there and if I'll get an answer then I'll place it here. PS. Statement: composer/lyricist = 50/50 or 33/33/33 etc. acts when there is no an agreement between parties involved, right?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30 |
I agree Alec. I would make sure there are separate titles for the instrumental version and song version, so there isn't any confusion. And as I stated previously; if the song collaboration is finished before an instrumental version, then it's appropriate to credit the 50/50 ownership of both versions - IMO. Best, John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,210
Top 50 Poster
|
OP
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,210 |
I am not asking if I can take someone's music they wrote to my lyrics and use it for MYSELF only, I am saying, would I still be considered a co-write on music that was written to my lyric, but we together wanted to use the instrumental for other purposes? Or is that rude or unfair for me to ask a co-writer for that? I don't know what the legality of that is...anyone? and what would feel fair for both parties
Kim
*Always open to collaborations on my lyrics.. with singers and musicians, but PLEASE contact me before putting work into one--in case someone else has it..thanks!!** BMI Member All Rights Reserved http://www.littleikepublishing.com Email for Song Business Only littleikeproductions@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30 |
I am not asking if I can take someone's music they wrote to my lyrics and use it for MYSELF only, I am saying, would I still be considered a co-write on music that was written to my lyric, but we together wanted to use the instrumental for other purposes? Or is that rude or unfair for me to ask a co-writer for that? I don't know what the legality of that is...anyone? and what would feel fair for both parties
Kim I would consider yours a 50/50 collaboration - on both versions Kim. When I compose a song from someone's lyrics, often those lyrics guide my melody. In which case, the lyricist would have an active part in the composing of the melody/music. Though this question should be discussed with your collaborator. Your collaborator may share the same position on this. Best, John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,670 Likes: 2
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,670 Likes: 2 |
Kim, check what I wrote above. Donna
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 854
Top 500 Poster
|
Top 500 Poster
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 854 |
It wouldnt be rude to ask, after all you did work together on the same song, and I would say most decent people would say "ok we are a team here, so well sign as a team too, regardless. After all, somebody could decide they like your lyrics, and write new music to it, then that version is pitched and accepted, what happens to the original musician, he could be left out unless you add them as a cowriter?
What should be and what is are not always the same thing though.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,845
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,845 |
It's not a silly question at all, Kim. These details are absolutely neccesary to understand when you want to pitch your music in the business world.
What Brian said is the default arrangement, if you don't have an agreement that states otherwise, Kim.
It all comes down to whatever agreement you've worked out. If you don't have one, everything must be considered equal split by default, and you have to depend on your co-writers consent.
If you don't have a specific agreement worked out, you can always ask him/her, and then put it in writing. But you HAVE to agree on something, before you can proceed.
No music library (worth their salt) would sign anything from you, if you are not able to document that you have the rights to the music you pitch. NEVER do that, it's an instant dealbreaker and lawsuit liability.
So, unless you have clear (written) agreements, what Brian said will apply. You are in this together :-) If you do have a clear agreement, it should be obvious what you can and can't do.
Make it a habit of doing the paperwork up front when you are cowriting. Every pro-writer does this, so if your co-writer doesn't, you need to put on the pro hat in that particular collaboration :-)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,210
Top 50 Poster
|
OP
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,210 |
Kim, check what I wrote above. Donna Hi Donna, yes I saw it, and thanks, it seems there are differing opinions...man, I wish I had asked this while in Nashville in front of lawyers who deal with this for a living Kim
*Always open to collaborations on my lyrics.. with singers and musicians, but PLEASE contact me before putting work into one--in case someone else has it..thanks!!** BMI Member All Rights Reserved http://www.littleikepublishing.com Email for Song Business Only littleikeproductions@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,670 Likes: 2
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,670 Likes: 2 |
Kim, I asked MAB the identical question, and that's what he told me. I've also seen that consensus elsewhere. Bearing in mind, it has only to do with the lyric & the music, and whether one will be used without the other. It's the variations on this theme that are problematic. Donna
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,210
Top 50 Poster
|
OP
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,210 |
Everyone, thanks so much for answering this and giving opinions, it is helpful and something I need to research further. Kim
*Always open to collaborations on my lyrics.. with singers and musicians, but PLEASE contact me before putting work into one--in case someone else has it..thanks!!** BMI Member All Rights Reserved http://www.littleikepublishing.com Email for Song Business Only littleikeproductions@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,579 Likes: 13
Top 10 Poster
|
Top 10 Poster
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,579 Likes: 13 |
Kim,
As you describe it, you own that music as much as your co-writer does and he owns your lyric as much as you do. Unless other arrangements were made, once you co-wrote a song with words and music, one can't be separated from the other without mutual agreement. This is why it's a good idea to have a written agreement explaining what it means when you work with someone on a song together so both parties understand what can and can't happen. I wonder if we could get a simple form for our members to use and sign explaining these things. Perhaps Stuart could help.
Also to John: On any version of Silent Night, since that is public domain, what you own is the arrangement, not the song or music. That person could use a different arrangement and not owe you anything, but if they want to use your arrangement then you are entitled to compensation. I suggest a quick chat with your attorney to clarify all this for you.
Brian
Brian Austin Whitney Founder Just Plain Folks jpfolkspro@gmail.com Skype: Brian Austin Whitney Facebook: www.facebook.com/justplainfolks"Don't sit around and wait for success to come to you... it doesn't know the way." -Brian Austin Whitney "It's easier to be the bigger man when you actually are..." -Brian Austin Whitney "Sometimes all you have to do to inspire humans to greatness is to give them a reason and opportunity to do something great." -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 692 Likes: 1
Top 500 Poster
|
Top 500 Poster
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 692 Likes: 1 |
It depends on your collaboration agreement which can say just about anything two people can agree on.
Get one, that's my advice.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,865
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,865 |
You've got so much good information here. Personally I prefer 50/50 if the music was done for the lyric as a collab. Whenever I've wanted to add lyric to a musical piece, I've always expected the composer to retain the right to market their part without a split. But that's only if that was already the intended purpose and I came in with a lyric I felt fit their music. I've had cowrites where the music was sent and I was asked to write lyrics for it as a complete cowrite. I think it's important to discuss expectations up front to avoid questions later.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 692 Likes: 1
Top 500 Poster
|
Top 500 Poster
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 692 Likes: 1 |
This is not a silly question, this is an astute question for which I have had personal experience. And, I researched and found the answer on the www.copyright.gov website because I could not afford a lawyer, but the governing code on this is crystal clear. If the creator of the music has the music in tangible form prior to the addition of lyrics, then another creation is made and a second tangible form with music and lyrics, the second is called a "derivative copyright", meaning the creator of the music has a prior copyright. This means the copyrght owner of the preexisting work can do anything he or she wants to with the music, unless there is a collaboration agreement placing restrictions. According to US Copyright Law ( I got this right from the website ) for a copyright to exist a work must merely be in tangible form. If the preexisting work was registered prior to the new work, all the better. If there is a prior copyright ( by virtue of it being registered or existing in tangible form prior to the addition of lyrics), then, here is the pertinent code governing this, which is more general, but it is inclusive of this circumstance you are in: Copyright Law So states: Section 103 (b) The copyright in a compilation or derivative work extends only to the material contributed by the author of such work, as distinguished from the preexisting material employed in the work, and does not imply any exclusive right in the preexisting material. The copyright in such work is independent of, and does not affect or enlarge the scope, duration, ownership, or subsistence of, any copyright protection in the preexisting material. Per circular one, page 3 Copyright is secured automatically when the work is created, and a work is "created" when it is fixed in a copy or phonorecord for the first time. "Copies" are material objects from which a work can be read or visually perceived either directly or with the aid of a machine or device, such as books, manuscripts, sheet music, film, videotape, or microfilm. "Phonorecords" are material objects embodying fixations of sounds (excluding, by statutory definition, motion picture soundtracks), such as cassette tapes, CDs, or vinyl disks. Thus, for example, a song (the "work") can be fixed in sheet music ("copies") or in phonograph disks ("phonorecords"), or both. If there is no prior copyright on the music ( it did not exist in tangible form, and/or was not registered prior to the addition of lyrics ), and you recorded the music and lyrics, or did a "lead sheet" i.e, put it in tangible form, you are SH*T OUT OF LUCK! Sorry! If the lyrics are written down, but the music is not recorded, or sheet music is not created, then the addition of music would be the derivative work, and the reverse applies, if I am interpreting the law correctly ( that's a mighty big IF ). FYI: I am not a lawyer, always seek the advise of one, don't rely or armchair advise givers like me
Last edited by pathardy; 10/31/12 05:00 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,195 Likes: 1
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,195 Likes: 1 |
If there is an agreement between the parties, the agreement will control. If the agreement does not specifically address this issue but does provide for a 50/50 split, then it would not matter who wrote the music and who wrote the lyrics.
Tom
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,579 Likes: 13
Top 10 Poster
|
Top 10 Poster
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,579 Likes: 13 |
Pat,
Thanks for posting the language Pat. Always good to have the actual words.
Now my advice to all reading it is to NOT TRY AND INTERPRET IT or make ANY DECISIONS based on your reading of it.
My suggestion, no matter what the above might mean for any situation you are involved it is to TALK TO YOUR CO-WRITER, come to an agreement and write down your agreement in simple straightforward terms. If it were me, I'd agree to split 50/50, talk through various scenarios which are concerns for either and document what you both discussed and sign a copy for each other.
Now, if you desire any other agreement terms other than that, I suggest writing it down, both signing it as well. Remember, you can make any deal with both agree to, but if you plan a long relationship, splitting 50/50 often balances out even if one person does 90% of one song, the next might be the reverse. You might also learn that you're someone who has tons of ideas and can get songs mostly finished but not completely on your own and perhaps your co-writer takes that raw work and finishes it off very nicely. And if you feel the deal becomes too lopsided after some time goes by, then find a new partner and move on, writing newer and better songs. And if one of those older songs turns out to be a hit, remember that even if they only contributed a tiny portion (or even nothing in the end) that the relationship itself, by merely existing and attempting to work together, has an impact on the final work. I have many songs that are co-writes where this dynamic took place, but the song would not be what it is today without that partnership no matter how it divided up. And working with someone by starting out making it clear they aren't worthy to equal credit seems like an unhealthy way to start. Perhaps if you need something other than 50/50, that's not the right partner to work with.
Also, if you have a special circumstance, like a finished lyric or music track ready, if you're not sure you want to share that 50/50, then discuss it BEFORE that other person even sees/hears what you've done and come to a 1 song/scenario agreement and write it down so later there is no question what terms were agreed to.
Bottom lines:
1. Communication early and often and clearly and openly and honestly. You don't have to agree. No one should ever be or feel pressured into working together with uncomfortable or unfair terms they may not agree with or understand. If talking doesn't resolve things for both sides, do NOT start writing together. Unless there's a compelling reason, strongly consider an equal 50/50 split. Then write, write and write some more and don't keep tabs on who writes what. It worked pretty well for Lennon/McCartney.
2. Don't read legalease and assume you fully understand how it might apply to what you are doing. If you have a special situation that is important to you, ask a legal expert to clarify it 100% for you. It might cost a few bucks (don't let someone gouge you) but it is worth knowing and not guessing and hoping for the best. But also keep in mind that few songs ever make a dime. If a 50/50 arrangement seems desperately inappropriate, then it may be worth seeking a lawyer.
Work out the hard part first, so you can relax and have fun creating new works for the world to enjoy!
Brian
Brian Austin Whitney Founder Just Plain Folks jpfolkspro@gmail.com Skype: Brian Austin Whitney Facebook: www.facebook.com/justplainfolks"Don't sit around and wait for success to come to you... it doesn't know the way." -Brian Austin Whitney "It's easier to be the bigger man when you actually are..." -Brian Austin Whitney "Sometimes all you have to do to inspire humans to greatness is to give them a reason and opportunity to do something great." -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,195 Likes: 1
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,195 Likes: 1 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,827
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,827 |
Hey Caroline,
I'll just speak from practical terms, rather than legal.
To me, when a song is written in collaboration, then it's a 50/50 split. It doesn't matter who wrote what. You are both now married, and cannot be divorced.
To me, ALL proceeds generated from the song are split between the writers 50/50.
I've noticed that all the music libraries and licencing agencies( Audiosparx in particular ) are asking for full songs as well as songs minus the vocal track. There are two reasons for this. Firstly that a musical director may require just music only, and secondly that they are dealing with professional people who own their own master traacks, and can edit them at will.
If they need music from the track ( only ) and we had written the tune together, IMHO, the lyricist would still recieve 50% of revenue, as what has been asked for is simply a derivative of a song written together. Full stop.
That's just the way I work anyways. It may also work in reverse. Perhaps someone likes the lyrics, and would like to use them as spoken word in a project. The composer still gets 50%.
Once the song has been registered with a PRO, with relevant splits, then in my opinion, any revenue is split accordingly.
A simple note here..... work with those you know, and don't be involved with ramdom collabs.
cheers, niteshift
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 6
Casual Observer
|
Casual Observer
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 6 |
Tom - you and Brian are both on target. Co-writers' discussing and entering into agreements with regard to foreseeable future situations can avoid such problems.
Prior agreement is ideal, but then in the real world co-writing can happen rather spontaneously. In the absence of agreement to the contrary, the music and lyrics become fused. They are one single work, the parts of which and the whole of which is/are owned by the co-writers/co-owners.
It also needs to be said, though, that the precise facts of the situation must always be considered carefully. The general rule assuming equal ownership of a co-authored work, and that fusing the words and music, may or may not govern. Seek advice from competent counsel in each instance. The details matter.
Also, the comment above with regard to the adding of words or music to a pre-existing work not entitling the one adding material to rights in the pre-existing work is on target as well. Here again, though, agreement between the parties can vary this.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 692 Likes: 1
Top 500 Poster
|
Top 500 Poster
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 692 Likes: 1 |
You can do anything that it says on the collaboration agreement that both of you decide is mutually acceptable. It can be a handshake, but you do want to get such things on the up and up, but I'd get it in writing, to play it safe, as in a collaboration agreement. On my collaboration agreements I specifify, IF: 1. I composed the music prior to lyric added, without significant changes to the melody to accommodate the lyric, I require 100% clearance of the melody. There are two copyrights, the first being the melody, the second being the words with melody, which at this juncture is a 'derivative copyright'. Because the melody was created wholly independent and therefore without due influence from the lyric, I feel it is my right. Note, if you don't get a copyright or at least put the precomposed melody in material or physical form, you have no prior copyright and rule #2, below, automatically applies. ( This is my interpretation of the law, I am not lawyer!!! ). 2. A lyric is handed to me, and I create a melody from the lyric, or if both are created relatively in the same time frame whereby both efforts result in the final song, both having a relatively equal influence on the other, then it's 50/50 control down the line. That's how I do it, anyway. Hope this helps Pat Hardy Lockwood
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
Forums117
Topics125,717
Posts1,160,950
Members21,470
|
Most Online37,523 Jan 25th, 2020
|
|
"If one man can do it, any man can do it. It is true. But the real question is, if one man did it, are you willing to do what it takes to do it as well?" –Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|