7 members (bennash, rpirone, Gary E. Andrews, JAPOV, Sunset Poet, Guy E. Trepanier, 1 invisible),
917
guests, and
254
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leafs
by Gary E. Andrews - 03/04/24 12:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 240
Serious Contributor
|
OP
Serious Contributor
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 240 |
QUANTITY OR QUALITY
This is an interesting article written by Professor Gary Ewer
Back when the late Stan Good used to write A Song Par Jour,on J P F, hardly any of those Lyrics got turned into finish songs, nothing wrong with that I’m sure most here would agree, however sadly Stan would hardly ever consider re writing a lyric, I only know that because Stan and his wife stayed with us at our holiday home in FRANCE at least on two occasions, via a visit to their son who was studying at a French University for a couple of years, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Article written by professor Gary Ewer
Getting lots of musical ideas is only good if they’re good ideas. Ask yourself how many songs you think you should be writing, and why. If it is a hard question to answer, it’s because the number of songs you write is probably only important to you, and that should tell you something.
Think quality, not quantity. Like Sechter, no one will remember you for the number of songs you wrote. Songs that have any kind of longevity are ones that show that the writer had a true grasp of the fundamentals of good song structure. That has little to nothing to do with how much.
If quantity is still important to you, consider having several songs on the go at any one time. Having 3-5 songs in various stages of completion allows you to move from one to another as you “get stuck” with one. It’s probably your best way to move into the world of being prolific. (copyright by Gary Ewer)
(Back To Me)
I expect we all have varied views on this, I would add Stan never played a musical instrument , but it wasn’t for lack of trying I woke up one morning and heard him trying to Get a melody out of my Bass Guitar out on our Patio
Good Old Days R I P Stan
P S Good memories, and I am certain Stan did finish a few songs in collaboration with older J P F members ?
Last edited by Cheyenne; 09/07/19 05:34 AM.
One of the most important principles of songwriting is to remember that a good song is a partnership of many different components, all working together to produce a satisfying musical experience.
In that respect, song components are either enhancing or compromising their combined effects.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,271
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,271 |
Stan.. what a great person he was, always finding time for others. And never getting upset. I know that many many people on JPF have fond memories of him.
R.I.P Stan and God Bless
From me and Helen who is now with you in Gods arms.
Roy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30 |
Good ol' Stan! I'll never forget his kindness. John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,979 Likes: 15
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,979 Likes: 15 |
I remember Stan, good guy.
Quantity or Quality for songwriting? Depends who you ask. Some say the only way to learn how to write good songs is to write alot of bad ones.
From what I understand, Springsteen's Darkness on The Edge of Town, originally had 70 songs written and only 10 made the album!
Writing alot of songs also enables you to use pieces of those songs for other songs. Plus writing alot keeps the engine running.
There's also the problem that nobody knows what a good song is.... but that's another story.
Last edited by Fdemetrio; 09/07/19 12:36 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,134 Likes: 10
Top 200 Poster
|
Top 200 Poster
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,134 Likes: 10 |
Quantity is an exercise on the path to quality, one learns ones strengths and abilities via quantity.
One will most assuredly reach some form of subjective quality only through the exercise of quantity.
Three cents.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,134 Likes: 10
Top 200 Poster
|
Top 200 Poster
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,134 Likes: 10 |
And by the way.....I miss Stan too.. ..he was so incredibly affable and.....well....stan.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 3,960 Likes: 84
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 3,960 Likes: 84 |
Lol.... I listen to great songs every day that will never make a cent or be played on the radio..... I guess that just makes me a poor critic
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,159 Likes: 5
Top 25 Poster
|
Top 25 Poster
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,159 Likes: 5 |
The goal is quality.
Stan was a great guy, no question. But he posted hundreds of lyrics of very poor quality...no hooks/titles, wildly uneven meter rendering them unusable by composers, themes no one would ever want to sing etc, etc. He never improved. His lyrics weren't rungs on a ladder to quality.
JPF had many such posters back then. If you go back and read posts from 2004, you'll see weak lyrics with dozens of positive comments that went nowhere. An honest critique about writing to the hook, smoothing meter or structure was a rare bird, indeed.
Also rare from those days is a viable demo born of those lyrics. Part of being viable is a meter and structure where the singer isn't forced to "talk" the lyric because it's unsingable. Verses that support a memorable hook. A theme that lends itself to a second vs and bridge that progress beyond the section that preceded it. Quantity means nothing without those things.
Last edited by couchgrouch; 09/08/19 12:11 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,117 Likes: 28
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,117 Likes: 28 |
Personally
I think quantity is what people do when they lack focus and meaningful song ideas.
it's akin to the idea of achieving 25 years of experience at something, versus achieving one year of experience 25 times.
my 2 cents
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,325
Top 10 Poster
|
Top 10 Poster
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,325 |
Quantity is what keeps my brain from going stagnant,it also holds "hooks or other useful lines" i can go back and steal from and write a quality lyric.RIP Stan.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,589 Likes: 1
Top 40 Poster
|
Top 40 Poster
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,589 Likes: 1 |
Quality or Quantity?
The part of me that ultimately answers the question is The Editor. He sits there and judges, thumbs up or down, and is probably right. But he's also a boring drag who who can't write (too busy judging), so The Editor doesn't get to play, doesn't get to have fun, doesn't get to mess around and create. He has to wait. He only gets to come in when it's time to alter, arrange, re-record, edit, mix and master.
The part of me that creates just wants to play. It wants to fly. It wants to paint things, reveal things, shout about things and make you feel it. It's like a force, an energy being channeled, and when I'm in this mode it's all the same quality to me, at this point anyway—it's all just stone being chiseled, paint being squeezed, stuff pouring out.
For me, quantity has to do with how often I get to create—I don't write any faster or slower than I ever do, I just write at the speed of writing. Some ideas strike like lightning, some slowly percolate to the surface, some are methodically constructed. If this were my sole profession, I'd be at it 80 hours a week minimum, kicking out boatloads. As it is, I have maybe ten hours a week to make music, so I don't need to load any boats. Whatever the pace, I only play what interests me, and I try to make whatever I'm making as well as I can.
So with me the speed of output doesn't change the quality of the output—I don't have an Awesome Mode and a Suck Mode. I just have this insufferable armchair quarterback of an Editor, judging it all after the fact.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,117 Likes: 28
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,117 Likes: 28 |
Quality or Quantity?
As it is, I have maybe ten hours a week to make music, so I don't need to load any boats.. Exactly, so you focus on the best stuff that comes to mind and spend what time you have developing that. Even if you have more time...that's the way to do it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,576 Likes: 13
Top 10 Poster
|
Top 10 Poster
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,576 Likes: 13 |
Quantity is an exercise on the path to quality, one learns ones strengths and abilities via quantity.
One will most assuredly reach some form of subjective quality only through the exercise of quantity.
Three cents. Yes. The worst thing any writer can do is hype over a handful of songs for DECADES without writing anything new or better. I think you need to do both to get where you are going. I do not believe that getting stuck in seeking perfect at the sacrifice of good enough is a trap that too many entry level writers get in. You have to write a lot of bad songs before the good ones come along. One exception? Susan Gibson wrote Wide Open Spaces in it's finished form as her first song. But, and this is key, she writes SO much better now. When you're first song is one of the highest earning songs in Country music history, that's a pretty good base to build on. But her newer stuff is far superior to it. And Stan was... in 2 words: The Man!
Brian Austin Whitney Founder Just Plain Folks jpfolkspro@gmail.com Skype: Brian Austin Whitney Facebook: www.facebook.com/justplainfolks"Don't sit around and wait for success to come to you... it doesn't know the way." -Brian Austin Whitney "It's easier to be the bigger man when you actually are..." -Brian Austin Whitney "Sometimes all you have to do to inspire humans to greatness is to give them a reason and opportunity to do something great." -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,117 Likes: 28
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,117 Likes: 28 |
Quantity is an exercise on the path to quality, one learns ones strengths and abilities via quantity.
One will most assuredly reach some form of subjective quality only through the exercise of quantity.
Three cents. Yes. The worst thing any writer can do is hype over a handful of songs for DECADES without writing anything new or better. I think you need to do both to get where you are going. I do not believe that getting stuck in seeking perfect at the sacrifice of good enough is a trap that too many entry level writers get in. You have to write a lot of bad songs before the good ones come along. One exception? Susan Gibson wrote Wide Open Spaces in it's finished form as her first song. But, and this is key, she writes SO much better now. When you're first song is one of the highest earning songs in Country music history, that's a pretty good base to build on. But her newer stuff is far superior to it. And Stan was... in 2 words: The Man! If you're in the business of songwriting and write a song every day and write with others, I agree. If you are an ammy who wishes they were, I suggest using what time is available and cherry picking your best stuff to spend it on. If merely having fun is the goal, then one should do whatever they feel like doing with their songwriting at any given moment. Including opining about quantity versus quality if that provides a good time. Context
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
Forums117
Topics125,690
Posts1,160,843
Members21,469
|
Most Online37,523 Jan 25th, 2020
|
|
"I left my home, only to find a new home, full of heart, soul and dreams. Then, I left that new home, heart intact, but much stronger and energized from the experience" -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|