10 members (Fdemetrio, VNORTH2, Gary E. Andrews, Perry Neal Crawford, couchgrouch, Sunset Poet, Guy E. Trepanier, bennash, Bill Draper, David Gill),
4,088
guests, and
270
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.
By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,412
Top 30 Poster
|
OP
Top 30 Poster
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,412 |
I read a short blurb on MSN that once again the courts will hear the case if Led Zepplin stole the melody or some such thing from an obscure melody someone else wrote. Now wouldn't you just love to be on that Jury!
Ray E. Strode
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15 |
I read a short blurb on MSN that once again the courts will hear the case if Led Zepplin stole the melody or some such thing from an obscure melody someone else wrote. Now wouldn't you just love to be on that Jury! Well i guess if you go to court enough times your odds of winning increase. Especially when you now know how the court process will go and what possible mistakes you made the first time and fix them. I guess if I was the band Spirit, and I really thought I had a case Id keep trying too. They must be working with a lawyer who will work on the "only if you win" premise. Im sure its pretty expensive to fight Led Zeppelin in court. Personally, I dont think it sounds very similar at all, some agree with me others dont. It sounds like a minor scale being picked up and down, with Led Zeps piece being more interesting and more musical
Last edited by Fdemetrio; 06/11/19 11:27 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29 |
I I think that it is pretty clear that they lifted it from a spirit song. Particularly given the history. In my opinion, it's unmistakable. I was surprised that Led Zeppelin prevailed the last time.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,579 Likes: 13
Top 10 Poster
|
Top 10 Poster
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,579 Likes: 13 |
Do you guys know which songs are being discussed? I bet there's a YouTube video showing an A/B comparison somewhere.
Brian Austin Whitney Founder Just Plain Folks jpfolkspro@gmail.com Skype: Brian Austin Whitney Facebook: www.facebook.com/justplainfolks"Don't sit around and wait for success to come to you... it doesn't know the way." -Brian Austin Whitney "It's easier to be the bigger man when you actually are..." -Brian Austin Whitney "Sometimes all you have to do to inspire humans to greatness is to give them a reason and opportunity to do something great." -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,412
Top 30 Poster
|
OP
Top 30 Poster
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,412 |
Well, I believe the song is Stairway to Heaven but have no idea when it was first released or if it was lifted from the other music. Did you know Slim Whitman recorded a song with the same Title but not the same song. Well they say bad news is better than no news at all eh.
Ray E. Strode
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15 |
Do you guys know which songs are being discussed? I bet there's a YouTube video showing an A/B comparison somewhere. There are tons of people exploiting this on youtube to garner views. Here's a musicians take: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCEg9gMJakU My take? This guy has a more convincing argument than Spirit does. I mean this sounds a lot more like it in spots. His name never appeared anywhere in any case. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWeejHJxGjs It was ruled that the song borrowed from classical music, so it couldnt be stolen from somebody modern. Well wait and see, never know how these cases go
Last edited by Fdemetrio; 06/12/19 11:19 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30 |
Give me a break. It's just a chord progression. And yes, it was used by classical composers back as far as J.S. Bach. I think Jim Croce's "Time in the Bottle" had a similar chord progression. Just a way for people without scruples to make money. No different than those lowlifes that stage falls in a stores. John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29 |
Give me a break. It's just a chord progression. And yes, it was used by classical composers back as far as J.S. Bach. I think Jim Croce's "Time in the Bottle" had a similar chord progression. Just a way for people without scruples to make money. No different than those lowlifes that stage falls in a stores. John Disagree. It is a unique sound that identifies arguably, what I think is the biggest pop song of all time. Led Zeppelin toured with spirit and the song was subsequent to that. If I was a juror, the defense attorney would have his work cut out for him.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30 |
Give me a break. It's just a chord progression. And yes, it was used by classical composers back as far as J.S. Bach. I think Jim Croce's "Time in the Bottle" had a similar chord progression. Just a way for people without scruples to make money. No different than those lowlifes that stage falls in a stores. John Disagree. It is a unique sound that identifies arguably, what I think is the biggest pop song of all time. Led Zeppelin toured with spirit and the song was subsequent to that. If I was a juror, the defense attorney would have his work cut out for him. So it's the sound not the music that's at the heart of it. So if I played that progression on clavichord in a classical style, there would be no copyright infringement. Got it... John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
John,
It's the exact same chord progression for 3 bars of 4/4 at around 67 BPM (or 6 bars at 134BPM), played in the same style on the same solo instrument (at the start) by a band that as Marty mentioned toured with Led Zep before the latter "wrote" Stairway, so there is a case, here. That last fact is very important. An attorney could prove that Page heard Spirit's guitarist (Randy California?) playing that, night after night.
Another song that came out around that time (with an almost identical chord progression for a few bars) is Chicago's "25 or 6 to 4" but it's at different tempo played by a full band with a driving rock sound, so no one thinks about Stairway or Taurus when they hear it. "Time In A Bottle" also has the descending half-step at work, but is in a brisk 3/4 or 6/8 and has different inner melodies playing with, so no one thinks of "Time In A Bottle" as being like Stairway or Taurus.
To have a case, everything must be the same, or a jury can't be made to hear it, and it's really about what those folks think, right? Normal folks will tend to hear similar things as different, unless the presentation is really similar, and the chords, melody, tempo, et al..are exact..
Having said that, I'm not sure how I feel. There is definitely a case here, though.
Mike
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 06/12/19 06:42 PM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29 |
What Mike said.
Revision to my last post...it is a unique sequence of sounds. I have no doubt that Page lifted.
Also...point out the natural sequence in the first 3 albums that led to Stairway. I don't hear one. The only antecedent I hear in the song that accords with Page's natural inclinations is the solo. I hear that modality in "SInce I Been Loving You"...on LZ3.
And John....if you were to play "You Really Got Me" on hapsicord and claim it as yours...that would be plagiarism.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30 |
Similar chord progression, though the guitar picking is a bit different. There's no doubt that both songs are easily identifiable from the other. If copyright infringements start using chord progressions as an infringement issue, we’re all in trouble. If one considers the songs in their entirety, there’s no copyright issues in my opinion. John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29 |
Similar chord progression, though the guitar picking is a bit different. There's no doubt that both songs are easily identifiable from the other. If copyright infringements start using chord progressions as an infringement issue, we’re all in trouble. If one considers the songs in their entirety, there’s no copyright issues in my opinion. John Answer a question John.... If LZ had not toured with Spirit and had Page not heard TAURUS repeatedly...do you think that STAIRWAY would exist at all?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15 |
I'm with John, If you could copyright a chord progression, every 50's song in the catalogue would be liable.
People are inspired by others all the time. If you want to use the circumstantial evidence of "they heard it from us" on tour, you could use the same argument for anything that sounds like Chuck Berry, so all your early Stones songs were stolen.
Everybody who ever played a pentatonic scale for a riff might have to pay chuck something.
How bout this for circumstantial evidence? imagine....that Spirit heard Jimi Page doodling on his guitar this sequence, before Jimmy completed the whole song. Lets say it was an ide he had brewing for a long time. But he started doodling and played it at rehearsal. Then Spirit hears this and writes their own song, and completes it first.
That's what your dealing with. He said, she said.
Hey im for the underdog, and if I knew the truth about it id be furious too. But as outsiders we don't.
Last edited by Fdemetrio; 06/13/19 09:57 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29 |
Yes, but if the similarity is striking enough (see Mike's post) and the accused plagiarizer had access which Page clearly did, and there is not a trail of musical compositions by the accused that obviously led to the content under question... Then in my opinion, you are making a rhetorical argument in defiance of the obvious.
It seems that someone somewhere agrees with that.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15 |
Yes, but if the similarity is striking enough (see Mike's post)
But isnt that the whole argument? IS it striking enough? I dont think so, John doesnt, Mike Does and You do. The Jury already ruled once that it wasnt, Musicologists have already said it leaned heavily on Classical music. Most musicians dont think it's stolen. Hey, there's also the "art of the steal" and Picasso said “good artists borrow, great artists steal.” I guess either way we can call Led Zep a great artist, lol What bugs me though, is nobody will even acknoweldge this. If it was stolen from Spirit, then Sprit surely stole it from this guy. If im Led Zeppelin, I bring this clip in and say who stole what from whom? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWeejHJxGjs
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29 |
Imo... you and John are making a rhetorical argument that is incorrect.
If you borrow from a piece of music that you had clear access to and was not a musical track that you were on, or showed any relation to anything that you did prior to the composition in question, and is clearly very similar, and a case can be made that your composition would not even exist had you not heard the borrowed one... Then I think most songwriters would agree that you should credit a co-writer. You can talk about chord progressions and everything else but if that sound is uniquely and clearly identifiable as the same in the minds of the jurors, then the defense has a problem. If I was on the jury... The defense would have a problem.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15 |
Imo... you and John are making a rhetorical argument that is incorrect.
If you borrow from a piece of music that you had clear access to and was not a musical track that you were on and anything that you did prior to the composition in question, and is clearly very similar, and a case can be made that your composition would not even exist had you not heard the borrowed one... Then I think most songwriters would agree that you should credit a co-writer. You can talk about chord progressions and everything else but if that sound is uniquely and clearly identifiable as the same in the minds of the jurors, then the defense has a problem. If I was on the jury... The defense would have a problem. Isnt the burden of proof on the accuser?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29 |
Sure it is.
And someone, in addition to me, apparently agrees that they have a case. So we shall see. I think it's interesting. It's also apparently a david-and-goliath type of thing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15 |
Sure it is.
And someone, in addition to me, apparently agrees that they have a case. So we shall see. I think it's interesting. It's also apparently a david-and-goliath type of thing. The only people who really know are Page and Spriit. If i knew Spirit was in the right, id back them 100%.
Last edited by Fdemetrio; 06/13/19 11:31 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,412
Top 30 Poster
|
OP
Top 30 Poster
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,412 |
Well, It is true you can be inspired by many others. I once thought a song had already been written so I asked my then Publisher if he had heard the song. He said he had not so I proceeded to write the song. It is Entitled: I'LL TAKE IT FROM HERE and is posted on the Web Site. Much later I remembered Ralph Emory interviewing George Jones. When Elvis came along George who liked Traditional country booked himself as Thumper Jones. Evidently Trying the Rock Craze that came along with Elvis. I never saw George as Thumper Jones but the interview came back to me so I wrote the song THUMPER JONES that is also on the Web Site. At times good ideas come to you and it turns into a song. No idea if Stairway was lifted from the other song or not. With the difference opinions here who knows how it will turn out. Write a Hit!
During the 2000 Presidential Election the LOST CHAD SONG came to me. The songs that come spontaneously probably are the best kind.
Last edited by Ray E. Strode; 06/13/19 11:59 AM.
Ray E. Strode
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
If copyright infringements start using chord progressions as an infringement issue, we’re all in trouble. John Riddle me this: When are chords also melody? When they're broken chords, like the intro to Taurus and Stairway! IOW, you can't hum a block chord, but you can an arpeggiated one. And if it's soloing with no background music, a listener is certainly hearing chords as melody I imagine this get's explored in the case.. It's a fuzzy area, at least to me. Mike
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 06/13/19 11:58 AM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15 |
Guys, make me happy, SOMEBODY please acknowledge this! He has a case against both artists, if we go there. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWeejHJxGjs
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30 |
Similar chord progression, though the guitar picking is a bit different. There's no doubt that both songs are easily identifiable from the other. If copyright infringements start using chord progressions as an infringement issue, we’re all in trouble. If one considers the songs in their entirety, there’s no copyright issues in my opinion. John Answer a question John.... If LZ had not toured with Spirit and had Page not heard TAURUS repeatedly...do you think that STAIRWAY would exist at all? Is that a trick question Martin? We are all influenced by what we hear through the years. Would Beethoven’s music exist as it is, if it weren't for Mozart. Mozart was a hell of an influence on Beethoven. My music is influenced by Rachmaninoff, Gershwin, Chopin, and Mancini. Bottom-line… Taurus and Stairway are both distinctive & different musical entities. Each stand on their own merits. Any music professor of composition and copyright law would agree. A jury of uneducated music listeners may not. The similarity of the guitar pickin’ chord progression doesn’t cut mustard with me buster.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
I listened and yes, there's similarities, and I see your argument. "If Spirit can sue Led Zep then why can't Graham sue Spirit" --and then perhaps no one sues anyone because it becomes apparent that the 2-3 bars of music is fairly common. There are probably hundreds more, post Spirit/Led Zep, like this Dolly Parton song from 1975: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGt0fvYadLQUltimately, Spirit will probably lose because there are tiny differences between the two. If this receives more argumentative weight than intention (on Page's part) then Spirit probably won't sway a jury. But I do think weight should be on if there was opportunity, motive, an acknowledgement on the part of Page, at the time, etc. Look..Spirit has a right to feel bitter--there was opportunity and motive, and given the lack of Page ever even acknowledging it, I can understand that bitterness. It's like Paul Simon's blatantly ripping off Martin Carthy's intro to Scarborough Fair and never acknowledging he did so, though he was in England and saw Carthy playing the song live, when "Scarborough Fair" wasn't even on Simon's radar. Rita Coolidge has a right to be bitter over Stigwood/Gordon and eventually Clapton for ripping off "Time" and using it for the second (instrumental) half of Layla. Bitterness can be damaging--the fame, the money, goes to someone else....and so wanting recompense seems organic in all of the above. I wonder if Page had had a conversation with Randy California such as, "hey mate, I like that little arpeggiated part of that instrumental you do Capricorn is it? Taurus? Can I nick it for this frankenstein of a song I'm writing, with like, ten parts in it? Just a few bars? I'll maybe change it a little." ... I wonder--would we be here today with this lawsuit? I think part of the reason there can be sustained bitterness is that Simon, Page, Gordon, etc..did not AT LEAST attempt SOME FORM of friendly attribution, after their songs changed their careers (in Simon's case*) or made them a bunch of money (in Clapton's and Page's)... Mike *Simon would eventually acknowledge his deed and offer retribution to Carthy, decades later.
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 06/13/19 12:53 PM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29 |
No John, It is a specific question. One that will be asked.
And it wont to be lost in rhetorical arguments about the history of music and composers.
Someone on a jury to whom music is a sequence of sounds, not notes or other music nomenclature will be asked if the absence of that specific sequence of notes anywhere in Jimmy Page's life would have also meant the absence of stairway???
If you were a juror and had to be specific, how would you answer,
And if you would reference Bach or Mozart, then spefically indicate which of their songs sounds like the intro to STAIRWAY and therefore is free to use.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30 |
No John, It is a spefic question. One that will be asked.
And it wont to be lost in rhetorical arguments about the history of music and composers.
Someone on a jury to whom music is a sequence of sounds, not notes or other music nomenclature will be asked if the absence of that specific sequence of notes anywhere in Jimmy Page's life would have also meant the absence of stairway???
If you were a juror and had to be specific, how would you answer,
And if you would reference Bach or Mozart, then spefically indicate which of their songs sounds like the intro to STAIRWAY and therefore is free to use.
Thanks You misunderstood my reference to Beethoven Martin. So, copyright shouldn't have anything to do with notes, only sequence of sounds? Whatever that means. If I were on the jury, I’d want the case thrown out. And as far as possible, so others are discouraged about filing frivolous lawsuits. John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29 |
John
I know you would. So would MAB I suspect, from what he's written previously. And if I was the defense attorney , I would load the jury with like minded professional composers.
If I was the prosecution I would look for writers who felt that they had been plagiarized. Such as Rita Coolidge and Randy California. ( deceased I think)
If reality prevails, the jury will find that Page expanded the Riff into Stairway to Heaven...imo. If and when they decide that, I don't know where it might go from there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
John and FD,
The whole argument of "but is it striking enough" shouldn't be the only criterion inmho. If it was, then you open the door to ANYONE being able to figure out the maximum amount of notes/bars/etc one can use that can be exact, and how many one can use if one "tweeks" one or two notes. And then "plundering" becomes part of one's compositional process.
Although I often encourage clients who can't sing their melody to point me to pieces of music to base parts of their songs on, I then tweek and pivot far enough away that there's very little resemblance, so I can understand "plundering" as part of the modern compositional process, for sure. But if it becomes okay to "almost duplicate exactly" ANY work for soloist for 3 or 4 bars, John, then we are truly in trouble. Broken chords are ALSO melodies, so THAT fact opens the door to ANY solo introduction being "nickable" --if one follows your train of thought to its ultimate conclusion.
This is why I believe, intention and opportunity, as well as "did anyone acknowledge" etc...should have much weight in these kinds of cases..
Mike
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 06/13/19 01:43 PM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
John, how would you feel if one of your more accessible solo piano pieces had an intro that someone used the exact same notes, melody, chords, rhythm..exact for almost four bars, but they add or change a couple little incidental notes...and the piece went on to make millions...
How would you feel if they were a member of this forum and you knew they probably heard your piece?
Would it be different from how you might feel if they were total strangers?
Just trying to generate some empathy for the plaintiff from you, regarding this case.
Mike
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 06/13/19 02:14 PM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29 |
John and FD,
The whole argument of "but is it striking enough" shouldn't be the only criterion inmho. If it was, then you open the door to ANYONE being able to figure out the maximum amount of notes/bars/etc one can use that can be exact, and how many one can use if one "tweeks" one or two notes. And then "plundering" becomes part of one's compositional process.
Although I often encourage clients who can't sing their melody to point me to pieces of music to base parts of their songs on, I then tweek and pivot far enough away that there's very little resemblance, so I can understand "plundering" as part of the modern compositional process, for sure. But if it becomes okay to "almost duplicate exactly" ANY work for soloist for 3 or 4 bars, John, then we are truly in trouble. Broken chords are ALSO melodies, so THAT fact opens the door to ANY solo introduction being "nickable" --if one follows your train of thought to its ultimate conclusion.
This is why I believe, intention and opportunity, as well as "did anyone acknowledge" etc...should have much weight in these kinds of cases..
Mike Beautifully stated.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
John, how would you feel if one of your more accessible solo piano pieces had an intro that someone used the exact same notes, melody, chords, rhythm..exact for almost four bars, but they add or change a couple little incidental notes...and the piece went on to make millions...
How would you feel if they were a member of this forum and you knew they probably heard your piece?
Would it be different from how you might feel if they were total strangers?
Just trying to generate some empathy for the plaintiff from you, regarding this case.
Mike John I want to add to the above, please don't say no one would do that cuz "my pieces are so dissonant, if they stole it would be obvious that they stole it from me because every bar of my music is fairly unique." --please avoid that. Notice I said, "one of your more accessible pieces" and that means something more common, and therefore bits and pieces used before, but not exactly how you put it together.... Then someone comes along and puts it together exactly the same way, save for an incidental note or two...and they make millions off it.. I am guessing you might be a little bitter? Especially if you knew they listened to your stuff.. Mike
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 06/13/19 02:29 PM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30 |
I’d have to accept it Michael. As long as the music met the copyright criterion. "Went on to make millions" - Mike … yes, and that's the only reason for these frivolous lawsuits. No one cares until there's money in the equation. John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29 |
I’d have to accept it Michael. As long as the music met the copyright criterion. John And if it did not or was as suspicious, as this case is? Fact is, I thought that this was done and settled. The further fact that they are back in court means someone somewhere thought that there is something to it. Do you think that the plaintiff should realize their frivolity, withdraw the suit and disappear?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
I’d have to accept it Michael. As long as the music met the copyright criterion. "Went on to make millions" - Mike … yes, and that's the only reason for these frivolous lawsuits. No one cares until there's money in the equation. John Fair enough, John. But your reply told me that you would at least be curious enough to find out if indeed copyright laws were violated. If they were, I imagine you would proceed accordingly. I also imagine that if the encroaching million-dollar-piece-of-music was considered "on the wire" but just barely NOT a violation, it might create a little rankle in your stoic demeanor? And one reason to file a lawsuit, even if you were told you "just missed" a copyright violation is because the law is not written in cement but is simply a foundation from which unfolds a much footnoted history. IOW, judges can create precendence. Every generation brings with it new technologies and so old laws can need updating. I imagine a majority of these cases start out with a feeling of betrayal. We hung out together and played music. You heard that song I wrote. Suddenly a part of it is on your album which went platinum. That can create animosity and unless you learn how to "let go" it can become something to obsess over. The fact that the artist who lifted your work made millions is just grease on the fire. Why should they be getting that money? It's my work, and they never even acknowledged that.,,such is the train of thought of a Randy California, I imagine, and I can empathize. I don't think I could rule for the plaintiff, though, unless I heard a believable narrative from Spirit as to why only now, is this an issue. It's not like they lived on another planet and only heard Stairway To Heaven once arriving on earth. I DO think that if Page had owned what he did early on, we wouldn't be here. As I said, these things start with a feeling of betrayal or of feeling violated. There are stand-up comics who lift each others stuff, often just changing names and incidentals but leaving the mechanics intact.. But the real "stand-up" stand-ups ask first. Letterman relates a story how he was bombing night after night in Denver in the late Seventies..and so after a few nights he called his buddy comedian George Miller and said, "George, I'm stealing your act.." I have completely different views, btw, when it comes to actual audio samples and sampling, as it's an art (which some do not acknowledge as such) and has a history not just of hip-hop/rap usage, but of pop collage artists like Beck, Momus, and others..but that's another train of thought for a different thread.. A link to the news story: https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture...tairway-heaven-copyright-lawsuit-n914831Mike
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 06/14/19 01:51 PM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30 |
Sounds about right Mike. Best, John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,426 Likes: 16
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,426 Likes: 16 |
Wow. How many times does a case have to be tried and dismissed to make it actually go away? This is an example of "sue and sue and sue again, no matter how many times you are defeated until you get the result you want.
This case was overturned before when it was demonstrated that the guy who wrote the Tarus song, stole the melody from a song ten years before him, and then that was taken from a melody from the 1500's. It is a long standing progression and another nonsense case.
My favorite statement from the trial was when Page said something to the effect as 'I don't remember the SIXTIES. If you think I remember some obscure riff, your daft." Half of what Zepplin did were melodies and riffs from old blues songs, and of course there is NEVER a BLUES SONG that sounds like another BLUES SONG. And if you think a major headliner is going to go and even LISTEN to an opening act, especially when you have babes, drugs and every kind of distraction in your dressing room you apparently have NEVER been around a major rock tour, especially in that era. Read "WHEN GOD'S WALKED THE EARTH" by Mick Wall.
Another example of the "Sue Somebody" mentality of today's lawsuit lottery. Those that can't do, sue. Nonsense no matter how many times it's done. But another real world example of why money for music will someday simply be gone.
MAB
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30
Top 20 Poster
|
Top 20 Poster
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,190 Likes: 30 |
Agree with you 100% Marc. John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,579 Likes: 13
Top 10 Poster
|
Top 10 Poster
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,579 Likes: 13 |
Wow. How many times does a case have to be tried and dismissed to make it actually go away? This is an example of "sue and sue and sue again, no matter how many times you are defeated until you get the result you want.
This case was overturned before when it was demonstrated that the guy who wrote the Tarus song, stole the melody from a song ten years before him, and then that was taken from a melody from the 1500's. It is a long standing progression and another nonsense case.
My favorite statement from the trial was when Page said something to the effect as 'I don't remember the SIXTIES. If you think I remember some obscure riff, your daft." Half of what Zepplin did were melodies and riffs from old blues songs, and of course there is NEVER a BLUES SONG that sounds like another BLUES SONG. And if you think a major headliner is going to go and even LISTEN to an opening act, especially when you have babes, drugs and every kind of distraction in your dressing room you apparently have NEVER been around a major rock tour, especially in that era. Read "WHEN GOD'S WALKED THE EARTH" by Mick Wall.
Another example of the "Sue Somebody" mentality of today's lawsuit lottery. Those that can't do, sue. Nonsense no matter how many times it's done. But another real world example of why money for music will someday simply be gone.
MAB I actually think the opposite of what you're saying here, not on this specific case, but in general. If you're a drugged out dude partying and albums are due, you're not at your best remotely. So stuff pops into your head and you likely don't know WHY it does, but you go, okay this works let's use it. He might not have INTENTIONALLY stolen it, but it isn't unlikely that he picked it up while it was playing some night and it stuck in his head. I can't imagine you've never once started working on your own song, gotten most of the way done, listened back and realized you've simply played the melody of an existing song. I know I did that several times over the years. What I would usually do in those cases was to keep the lyrics but write a new melody often basing it off my own orchestration ideas and I would make the adjustments and laugh about it. I remember being really excited one time to play a song I had written for a band I was in and I played it and they all said "that was great when Depeche Mode did it" and sure enough it was the same melody and there was even a similar lyric idea. It wasn't intentional in the least, and we had a laugh and moved on. With all the writing you've done I would be shocked if you never once had that happen to you. Melodies or lyric ideas often just pop into your head and often you have no idea where they came from. It is similar to when McCartney wrote Yesterday but was CONVINCED he had plagiarized someone else but his bandmates insisted no, it was amazing and original. In that case he thought that it was so well crafted it must have come from elsewhere. Ideas come like that. Now and then it was clearly from another source, unintentionally. Additionally, most melodies have been written before. Patterns that work, work. With the number of songs crafted worldwide, it is rare to come up with something new. And with all the music we are exposed to, especially songwriters, picking up inspirations from what pops into your head is quite common. It isn't an elitist thing either. Just because someone is an opening act doesn't make them scum of the earth devoid of talent compared to the great Jimmy Page. He's notorious for lifting ideas from other sources by his own admission. Why not the "opening act?" Brian
Brian Austin Whitney Founder Just Plain Folks jpfolkspro@gmail.com Skype: Brian Austin Whitney Facebook: www.facebook.com/justplainfolks"Don't sit around and wait for success to come to you... it doesn't know the way." -Brian Austin Whitney "It's easier to be the bigger man when you actually are..." -Brian Austin Whitney "Sometimes all you have to do to inspire humans to greatness is to give them a reason and opportunity to do something great." -Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 240
Serious Contributor
|
Serious Contributor
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 240 |
Marc you state the quote " Those That Cant Do Sue"
Well sorry to disagree but Beatle George Harrison was sued for copying melodies
of two songs And George could definitely write hit songs re "Something " and
"My Guitar Gently Weeps" to mention just two However his song "' My Sweet Lord "-
was definitely the melody written for " He's So Fine " a massive hit for THE CHIFFONS
and George was successfully sued by the Copyright owners of "He's So Fine "
The same thing happened with the melody of another earlier song, I'd Like To Teach The World To Sing
written by writers David and Jonathan , it was a close copy of "' There's a Blue Ring 'round My Heart Virginia '
written way back in the 1930s ------ So in fact many well known Song Writers have had their songs Plagiarized
Of course other cases have been unsuccessful, bought about by claimants who were basically tone deaf
and their complaints were thrown out of court , so to speak ------David and Jonathin have a catalog of Hit Songs
and so has George Harrison so "Those who cant do" does not apply to them
Last edited by Cheyenne; 06/19/19 06:57 AM.
One of the most important principles of songwriting is to remember that a good song is a partnership of many different components, all working together to produce a satisfying musical experience.
In that respect, song components are either enhancing or compromising their combined effects.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 240
Serious Contributor
|
Serious Contributor
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 240 |
CHORD PROGRESSIONS CAN NOT BE Copyrighted I thought everyone
was aware of that ???? And many of those old blues songs are out of copyright and
in fact in Public Ownership many of those songs were never even registered i
the first place ;
Uk Singer Lonnie Donnegan had Mega Hits buy updating old songs that were and
are classed as Traditional (In Public Ownership ) and he would have collected the full
royalties on those songs, as if he had been the original writer
One of the most important principles of songwriting is to remember that a good song is a partnership of many different components, all working together to produce a satisfying musical experience.
In that respect, song components are either enhancing or compromising their combined effects.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29 |
My favorite statement from the trial was when Page said something to the effect as 'I don't remember the SIXTIES. If you think I remember some obscure riff, your daft."
MAB
If I was Page's attorney, I would not have been happy when he said that. It opens the door to an assessment of him as living in a drug addled stupor incapable of legal considerations. "You're daft" adds an arrogant and entitled dimension to Page. "Obscure rift?" Here is how I think that it happened... Page toured with Spirit and was possibly stoned every night. The opening bars (riff) was an ear bug that got in his head. He started messing with it and following where it took him. Being a very talented songwriter, it took him through several movements which include, what I think, is the most emotionally concise and expressive guitar solo in rock music. When he finished it up he decided that a few bars at the beginning of a long song did not merit acknowledgement. Possibly he did not think about that at all. Stoned rock gods who tear up hotel rooms and are rumored to keep underage girls locked away in their house do whatever they want...after all. And all these years later someone is trying to decide if a few bars does merit an acknowledgement. It's interesting to me. ps...Which melody from the 1500's? (did Page's attorney dig up?)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29
Top 100 Poster
|
Top 100 Poster
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,126 Likes: 29 |
Never mind. I think that I found it.... https://www.guitarplayer.com/players/did-this-17th-century-work-influence-stairway-to-heavenPs...the 17th century is the 1600's. An excerpt... "Page, for his part, has testified that he never heard “Taurus” until a few years before the trial. Witnesses for the plaintiff did not tell the court they ever saw Page, who composed the music for “Stairway,” at a Spirit concert where the song was performed. Though Page’s extensive record collection includes a copy of Spirit’s 1968 debut album, which contains “Taurus,” the guitarist claims he has never played it, and it’s unknown if the album was in his collection at the time that he wrote “Stairway to Heaven” in 1971." "That's my story and I'm sticking to it."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 692 Likes: 1
Top 500 Poster
|
Top 500 Poster
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 692 Likes: 1 |
I would and I've heard the so-called "original", and it is just an arpeggio with a descending bass line over a minor chord. Well, the harmonic idea has been around since classical music, but Led Zep's take on it is original. I reject the claim that it was stolen. Therefore, I would vote in favor of Led Zep, for sure.
Last edited by Pat Hardy; 07/10/19 06:39 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
If there is closer scrutiny on Led Zep than on others in regards copyright violation, I believe it's rather humble to suggest that they have brought this upon themselves: https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/led-zeppelins-10-boldest-rip-offs-223419/It seems that they have garnered a bad reputation over the years.. Mike
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 08/05/19 12:30 PM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,589 Likes: 1
Top 40 Poster
|
Top 40 Poster
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,589 Likes: 1 |
There was a time when I thought musical copyright only applied to lyrics and melody. But looking at a lot of the cases tried, it's clearly about more than that. The Katy Perry lawsuit over her song "Dark Horse" was lost because of the synth riff...which I guess is melodic...but it seems odd to me that you can't do that, but you CAN write unlimited blues songs with the exact same structure and similar melodies. Than there's Led Zeppelin. This isn't the first time they've been accused of lifting other people's stuff...I don't think an album went by without them re-writing and rocking up a blues classic with basically the same lyrics and claiming it as their own, entirely. Here's a good list: https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/led-zeppelins-10-boldest-rip-offs-223419/I don't know where the line should be drawn, but Zeppelin definitely liked to push the boundaries further than any other band I can recall.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 15 |
There was a time when I thought musical copyright only applied to lyrics and melody. But looking at a lot of the cases tried, it's clearly about more than that. The Katy Perry lawsuit over her song "Dark Horse" was lost because of the synth riff...which I guess is melodic...but it seems odd to me that you can't do that, but you CAN write unlimited blues songs with the exact same structure and similar melodies. Than there's Led Zeppelin. This isn't the first time they've been accused of lifting other people's stuff...I don't think an album went by without them re-writing and rocking up a blues classic with basically the same lyrics and claiming it as their own, entirely. Here's a good list: https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/led-zeppelins-10-boldest-rip-offs-223419/I don't know where the line should be drawn, but Zeppelin definitely liked to push the boundaries further than any other band I can recall. I guess a riff is considered a melody. If you take most of the classic riffs of all time.... Smoke on the Water, Back In Black, Brown Sugar, etc, youd be sued instantly if you took it note for note, or even close. But if you took "In the Still Of the Night" there are so many songs that sound exactly like it. I think true original music is rare, but I think without copyright protection, why create anything? There's way more to songs than melody and lyric. if you remove The Beatles voices and performances and arrangements, and had somebody else do them, they will not come close to being as great. It will sound good probably and be enjoyed by many, but wont be as iconic. Creativity is in all parts of music, why cant Stewart Copeland copyright his drum beats? He has some amazing beats. Why cant some vocal groups copyright their harmony structure. Why cant somebody copyright a guitar sound they formulated and made popular? I could find the sounds on Guitar Rig to any classic tune and use it, why arent the creators of such things protected. Even a production technique, why cant wall of sound be protected, if a melody can. its all creativity, from the notes you use to support a melody to the sounds you use, to the style. HOW COME!
Last edited by Fdemetrio; 08/05/19 03:02 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,589 Likes: 1
Top 40 Poster
|
Top 40 Poster
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,589 Likes: 1 |
I know, right?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18
Top 50 Poster
|
Top 50 Poster
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,711 Likes: 18 |
I think true original music is rare, but I think without copyright protection, why create anything?
This is a question only modern (Westernized) people could ask. Creativity in and of itself is part of what it means to be human. Certainly it's at the top of the Maslovian hierarchy of needs and is only a concern after food, shelter, etc. have been met.* http://austinhillshaw.com/creativit...-leap-from-lack-to-creative-fulfillment/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs But still, in this our modern age, without SOME outlet for creativity, suicide rates would more than likely skyrocket, with a "loss of (life's) meaning" at the center and the recurring pattern in the suicides. And in non-Western cultures, music is less ego driven and more driven by community and spirituality. But in ours and European societies, and all cultures transformed by The Internet and social media (most of them at this point!), we have "designated receptacles" for our creativity like music, art, literature, and moving visuals, that can be copyrighted but also have "natural" protection from theft. Meaning that if you can prove you wrote the damn thing, that will probably be good enough in a court of law. Before the modern age, In the world of rural musics, folk, blues, etc..the practice of sharing was commonplace. Rural society at least seemed less ego driven and more about standing on the shoulders of elders and building something, watching something grow and participating in that growth.. Back to Led Zep.. They took advantage of people who were making music at the tail end of this less ego-driven way of doing things, like bluesmen Willie Dixon, Robert Johnson, Sonnyboy Williamson, and folkies like Bert Jansch and Joan Baez. And as Brian pointed out earlier, the whole process of theft can evolve organically and innocently enough, simply by getting together with bandmates and jamming. "What'll we play" "I dunno..I learned this cool new Howlin Wolf lick.." (begins to play lick..exciting the singer to recall another bluesman's words)..and then...MAGIC HAPPENS....and then attempts are made to transform the words and music into something else..but no magic...so.... --I am not excusing this practice, but it's the basic foundation of how many bands create, when they get together without an agenda.. As a composer, my main love, currently, is the act of transforming existing "works" or pieces of audio into completely different things that are only remotely connected. I say this just so you understand that I am not theoretically opposed to the act of creating derivative works from existing works. I think it's basically what we are all doing anyway, in varying degrees. Mike
Last edited by Michael Zaneski; 08/05/19 05:09 PM.
Fate doesn't hang on a wrong or right choice Fortune depends on the tone of your voice
-The Divine Comedy (Neil Hannon) from the song "Songs of Love" from the album "Casanova" (1996)
|
|
|
We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.
|
|
Forums117
Topics125,717
Posts1,160,950
Members21,470
|
Most Online37,523 Jan 25th, 2020
|
|
"If one man can do it, any man can do it. It is true. But the real question is, if one man did it, are you willing to do what it takes to do it as well?" –Brian Austin Whitney
|
|
|
|