Who's Online Now
23 registered members (couchgrouch, Gavin Sinclair, Delmont, Dennis Wright, 9ne, Dave Rice, Fdemetrio, 5 invisible), and 257 guests, and
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box
Member Spotlight
F Williams
F Williams
Nashville, TN
Posts: 146
Joined: December 2011
Show All Member Profiles 
What's Going On
ORDINARY MAN (feat. Donovan Plant)
by Rob B.. 09/25/18 02:01 AM
DOWN RIVER ROAD Mackie
by Mackie H.. 09/24/18 10:24 PM
John Rich/ Kaepernick
by Delmont. 09/24/18 09:16 PM
Doing The Same
by Ricki E. Bellos. 09/24/18 08:07 PM
Reaper
by Gavin Sinclair. 09/24/18 06:24 PM
Show me with Laura Kelsey
by Vicarn. 09/24/18 01:04 PM
Song Synergism
by Perry Neal Crawford. 09/24/18 12:39 PM
How many of you wrote number 1 songs
by Perry Neal Crawford. 09/24/18 11:46 AM
Box of Frogs
by Perry Neal Crawford. 09/24/18 11:36 AM
Forget About Her In Ten Years. Mike Zaneski vocal
by Travis david. 09/24/18 11:26 AM
Mr Sensible
by Gavin Sinclair. 09/24/18 09:14 AM
What a beautiful song this is...
by Passinwind. 09/24/18 06:13 AM
Seventeen
by Marvin Adcock. 09/24/18 06:02 AM
I've Been There (revised) glyn
by glynda. 09/24/18 02:10 AM
Now Is All There Is
by Moosesong. 09/22/18 04:34 PM
The Memory Lingers On
by Moosesong. 09/22/18 01:20 AM
Underground Railroad Medley
by couchgrouch. 09/21/18 05:09 PM
Is there Pro Music Industry people on this website
by Marc Barnette. 09/21/18 01:44 PM
Grandpa stood up for Jesus
by niteshift. 09/21/18 02:20 AM
Devotion
by niteshift. 09/21/18 01:50 AM
HELP ME PLEASE!!!
by Brian Austin Whitney. 09/20/18 02:49 PM
NEW MEMBERS CHECK HERE
by Brian Austin Whitney. 09/20/18 12:22 PM
You lying about my brother
by Spanky9. 09/20/18 07:34 AM
Son in Nashville...
by John Lawrence Schick. 09/20/18 05:56 AM
In France
by Gavin Sinclair. 09/19/18 01:25 PM
My GPS Is Set For Heaven
by F Williams. 09/19/18 09:59 AM
Go Go Boy
by Calvin. 09/19/18 09:54 AM
Too Good To Be Forgot
by Marvin Adcock. 09/19/18 05:58 AM
Love Goes
by Ricki E. Bellos. 09/18/18 08:52 PM
Top Posters(All Time)
Calvin 19,601
Travis david 11,021
Kevin Emmrich 10,540
Jean Bullock 10,330
Kaley Willow 10,240
Two Singers 9,571
Joice Marie 9,186
Mackie H. 8,840
glynda 8,576
Mike Dunbar 8,574
Tricia Baker 8,318
Colin Ward 7,899
couchgrouch 7,379
Corey 7,357
Dave Rice 6,802
Wyman Lloyd 6,578
Mark Kaufman 6,436
Joe Wrabek 6,403
ben willis 6,094
Vicarn 5,796
Lynn Orloff 5,788
Louis 5,725
Linda Sings 5,604
niteshift 5,435
KimberlyinNC 5,210
Derek Hines 4,893
DonnaMarilyn 4,622
Blake Hill 4,528
Neil Cotton 4,371
Bob Cushing 4,351
Bill Osofsky 4,199
Cindy Miller 4,178
Tom Shea 4,173
TamsNumber4 4,032
Roy Cooper 4,005
nightengale 3,965
Caroline 3,865
Kolstad 3,783
Dan Sullivan 3,710
MFB III 3,687
Dottie 3,427
joewatt 3,411
beechnut79 3,411
Bill Cooper 3,279
John Hoffman 3,199
E Swartz 3,148
Skip Johnson 3,027
Pam Hurley 3,007
Terry G 3,005
PopTodd 2,887
Harriet Ames 2,870
Nigel Quin 2,808
MidniteBob 2,707
Nelson 2,570
Tom Tracy 2,558
Polly Hager 2,526
Jerry Jakala 2,524
Al Alvarez 2,499
Eric Thome 2,448
Hummingbird 2,401
Stan Loh 2,263
Sam Wilson 2,241
Judy Hollier 2,232
Erica Ellis 2,202
Wendy D 2,184
TrumanCoyote 2,096
Marty Helly 2,012
DukeWill 1,984
floyd jane 1,980
Clint Anglin 1,904
cindyrella 1,888
maccharles 1,876
David Wright 1,866
Clairejeanne 1,851
Cindy LaRosa 1,824
Ronald Boyt 1,675
Iggy 1,629
Noel Downs 1,620
Rick Heenan 1,580
Cal 1,574
Jack Swain 1,554
Pete Larsen 1,537
Ann Tygart 1,529
Bud 1,519
Tom Breshers 1,487
RogerS 1,461
Tom Franz 1,452
Ralph Blight 1,440
Chuck Crowe 1,435
Kenneth Cade 1,429
Rick Norton 1,428
bholt 1,411
Letha Allen 1,406
in2piano 1,404
Stan Simons 1,402
GocartMoz 1,387
mattbanx 1,384
Jen Shaner 1,373
Charlie Wong 1,347
KevinP 1,324
Vondelle 1,316
Tom W. 1,313
Jan Petter 1,301
scottandrew 1,292
DakLander 1,265
Ian Ferrin 1,230
PeteG 1,228
Glen King 1,212
IdeaGuy 1,209
AaronAuthier 1,177
Diane Ewing 1,158
Martin Lide 1,107
Gerry 1,089
summeoyo 1,085
joro 1,081
BobbyJoe 1,075
S.DEE 1,040
yann 1,037
Tony A 1,016
lane1777 1,015
argo 986
peaden 984
Wolvman 960
IronKnee 937
Jak Kelly 912
krtinberg 890
Drifter 886
Petra 883
RJC 845
Brenda152 840
Nadia 827
Juan 797
TKO 784
frahmes 781
teletwang 762
9ne 747
90 dB 745
Andy K 739
tbryson 737
Deej56 733
Andy Kemp 733
ant 732
Jackie444 731
3daveyO3 704
Dayson 703
Dixie 701
Joy Boy 695
Knute 686
Lee Arten 678
Katziis 652
R.T.MOORE 638
quality 637
CG King 622
douglas 621
Mel 614
Fdemetrio 611
NaomiSue 601
Pat Hardy 599
Irwin 589
Shandy 589
Ria 587
TAMERA64 583
qbaum 570
nitepiano 565
pRISCILLA 556
Tink2 553
Moosesong 544
musica 539
deanbell 528
RobertK 527
BonzaiWag 523
Roderic 522
BB Wilbur 511
goodfolks 499
Zeek 487
Stu 486
Steve P. 481
R&M 469
KathyW 462
allenb 459
MaxG 458
Philjo 454
fanito 448
trush48 448
dmk 442
arealrush 437
DGR 436
avweek 435
Stephen D 433
Emmy 431
Rob L 426
marquez 422
kit 419
Softkrome 417
kyrksongs 415
RRon 408
Laura G. 407
VNORTH 407
Debra 407
eb 406
cuebald 399
EdPerrone 399
Dannyk1 395
Hobart 395
Davyboy49 393
Smile 389
GJShades 387
Ezt 384
tone 380
Marla 380
Cecilee 379
iggyiggy 378
coalminer 377
java 374
spidey 371
sweetsong 370
danny 367
Jim Ryan 360
Alek 356
papaG 353
Z - man 350
John K 348
JamesDF5 347
Jaden 344
ddreuter 341
TheBaz 340
Steggy 339
leif 339
tonedeaf 336
rickwork 334
Eddie Ray 332
Johnboy 328
Bob Lever 328
Helicon1 327
lucian 326
Muskie 321
kc 319
Z. Mulls 318
ptondreau 313
ONOFFON 312
Chris B. 310
trush 304
ed323 297
Ellen M 293
lizzorn 291
nicnac49 290
pomeranj 289
Char 286
ktunes 285
markus-ky 284
Register Today!
Welcome to the Just Plain Folks forums! You are currently viewing our forums as a Guest which gives you limited access to most of our discussions and to other features.

By joining our free community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with our users (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free; so please join our community today!
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#1094973 - 11/03/15 09:06 AM Standard practice? Ethical or not?  
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,622
DonnaMarilyn Offline
Top 100 Poster
DonnaMarilyn  Offline
Top 100 Poster

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,622
Netherlands
I'm curious about something, and would welcome folks' input. A couple of years ago, I was in a situation that involved an offer of what was termed a 'co-write' but would have meant me paying up front and in full an exorbitant fee ($8330) for production costs. I declined the offer, of course, also for reasons apart from the fee, but I still wonder about the ethics of one element of the proposal.

I'd sent six pieces (2 songs, 4 lyrics) for review to a professional consultant, whom I'll call 'X'. X claimed to have numerous Grammy-award winners as clients.

X was highly enthusiastic about the two songs in particular. The one that X wanted to start with was a polished demo with a professional vocalist, and had already been critiqued (twice) professionally, and approved (both music & lyrics). When sending the song to X, I'd hoped that perhaps I would be pointed in the direction of a pitcher or a publisher. It wasn't with the intention of the song undergoing a massive overhaul.

However, X wanted to re-write parts of the lyric and have the music completely rewritten. In other words, I should scrap the work that my collaborator had done so that X could bring in a new composer to create an entirely new track. I think X was going to do the melody. This seemed odd to me. The notion of dropping the painstaking - and already highly praised - work done by my very good collaborator, and handing the adjusted lyric to a different composer for new music and a melody, struck me as questionable to say the least. X informed me that the original composer would still be entitled to a share of my royalties from the song if it were published. To me, this seemed to make things even more convoluted.

Question: Is what I've described a normal and ethical procedure in the industry?

I welcome your thoughts.

Donna


Honour the Earth. Without it, we'd be nowhere.

Life is too important to take seriously.

http://www.reverbnation.com/donnamarilynrichblend

Guild of International Songwriters and Composers


#1094974 - 11/03/15 09:52 AM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: DonnaMarilyn]  
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,899
Colin Ward Offline
Colin Ward  Offline

Top 25 Poster

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,899
Saint Petersburg. FL
Preying on hopes and dreams is what I would call that. There is practically no money to be made as a musician or songwriter unless you are at the very peak of the game (same as baseball, photography, football, golf, and other pleasurable hobby-based pastimes). But there is a ton of money to be made supplying services and equipment to all the wannabes. Guitar manufacturers, plugging services, recording studios, camera manufacturers, etc. etc.

My take on Mr X and dozens of others like him is that he is looking for people who dream of making it big and finding ways to separate them from their money by promising some hope of success. Is it ethical? Not sure, but if it is not, he is in the same class as hundreds of others. Is it standard practice? Among those who prey on dreams....yes, probably. Should you have spent the money?...no.

Would his version of your song done better than the one you already had? No-one will ever know, but probably not. Are Grammy winners all successful and wealthy?...no. Are there people in this world who can actually make you and your song successful? Possibly, but they will have a long list of recent successes and be well connected today with people who are in control today, not 10 years ago. Should they be asking for money up front like Mr. X....no, because they will be confident that they will make far more from the royalties and licenses that their connections will get you both.

Is the music business full of liars, cheats and vagabonds? Yes, but so are most other businesses.

Just my opinions!



Colin

I try to critique as if you mean business.....

http://colinwardmusic.com/

http://rosewoodcreekband.com/


#1094981 - 11/03/15 12:19 PM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: Colin Ward]  
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,442
Everett Adams Offline
Top 40 Poster
Everett Adams  Offline
Top 40 Poster

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,442
,NL Canada
Amen brother. There are so many scams out there and they take on so many forms it is hard to keep up. They must find a small percentage that fall for their lies or else they would give up and get aa honest job.

#1094991 - 11/03/15 01:43 PM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: Everett Adams]  
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,039
Ray E. Strode Online content
Top 30 Poster
Ray E. Strode  Online Content
Top 30 Poster

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,039
Brunswick, Ga. USA
Well,
There are two things about that X. One is Let the buyer Beware and As P.T. Barnum put it, THERE IS A SUCKER BORN EVERY MINUTE. And there are stories of people getting ripped off, Scammed by telling them they have won a huge sum of money all they have to do is send a processing fee to get the money.


Ray E. Strode
#1094995 - 11/03/15 02:55 PM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: Ray E. Strode]  
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,622
DonnaMarilyn Offline
Top 100 Poster
DonnaMarilyn  Offline
Top 100 Poster

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,622
Netherlands
Colin, Everett, and Ray, thanks for chiming in. smile

Yes, it was clear to me from basically the get-go that the whole thing was a scam.

What I'm curious about specifically, though, is whether it's standard practice (and in my opinion, unethical, even if the original composer would have been entitled to a share of the royalties) to propose stripping the music from an already decent song/finished demo, so that a new melody and music could be created for it by a third party.

Seems to me this ploy is simply one element towards justifying the bizarrely high fee.

Donna


Honour the Earth. Without it, we'd be nowhere.

Life is too important to take seriously.

http://www.reverbnation.com/donnamarilynrichblend

Guild of International Songwriters and Composers


#1094998 - 11/03/15 03:59 PM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: DonnaMarilyn]  
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,540
Kevin Emmrich Offline
Kevin Emmrich  Offline


Top 10 Poster

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,540
Crozet, VA
Originally Posted by DonnaMarilyn
...What I'm curious about specifically, though, is whether it's standard practice (and in my opinion, unethical, even if the original composer would have been entitled to a share of the royalties) to propose stripping the music from an already decent song/finished demo, so that a new melody and music could be created for it by a third party....


I wouldn't think that it was that uncommon -- look how many songs Max Martin is co-writer on as the song's producer. However, the original composer should still be listed as a full songwriter, not taking 1/2 your cut! In any case, you made the right decision. Sounds like the new producer wanted 1/2 the song writing, all the publishing and wanted you to subsidize the song's recording and production. I think running away at full speed was the smart thing to do!


"It's supposed to be hard. If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The 'hard' is what makes it great."
Kevin @ bandcamp: Crows Say Vee-Eh (and Kevin @ FAWM 2018)
#1095022 - 11/04/15 12:37 AM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: DonnaMarilyn]  
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,899
Colin Ward Offline
Colin Ward  Offline

Top 25 Poster

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,899
Saint Petersburg. FL
Originally Posted by DonnaMarilyn
Thanks for chiming in, folks. smile

Yes, it was clear to me from basically the get-go that the whole thing was a scam.

What I'm curious about specifically, though, is whether it's standard practice (and in my opinion, unethical, even if the original composer would have been entitled to a share of the royalties) to propose stripping the music from an already decent song/finished demo, so that a new melody and music could be created for it by a third party.

Seems to me this ploy is simply one element towards justifying the bizarrely high fee.

Donna


I don't know how often that is done, but if I had all the tracks from the original recording, I could strip out all the unwanted music in about 60 seconds, so I don't think that justifies an $8,000 fee, although I would gladly accept it.


Colin

I try to critique as if you mean business.....

http://colinwardmusic.com/

http://rosewoodcreekband.com/


#1095023 - 11/04/15 01:02 AM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: DonnaMarilyn]  
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,259
Barry David Butler Offline
Top 100 Poster
Barry David Butler  Offline
Top 100 Poster

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,259
Sebring, Florida USA
A Scam from the Get Go.
These people are "Dream Busters and Charlatans" ...
It's disgusting but I've actually heard worse things.
NEVER pay for anything.....
They Prey on Dreamers.....and Dreams.
B

#1095025 - 11/04/15 01:46 AM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: Colin Ward]  
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 236
Chris Erhardt Offline
Serious Contributor
Chris Erhardt  Offline
Serious Contributor

Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 236
NYC/L.A.
Hey Donna, I thought I'd jump into the conversation to give you my take on this being on 'the other side' of the business ;-)

I don't know the exact details of how Mr. X got you to contact him and what was part of the deal other than the production. If he was upfront with you saying that the fee will give you a production and nothing else, fair play. It would be an expensive production, but as long as he doesn't make any empty promises I would say it was an expensive but legit deal.

However, being in music production myself, I know that many production companies promise to 'plug' songs, or act as your 'publisher' if you go with them and in most cases, this is probably nothing but a marketing trick to lurk you in to buying the production for $$$. Some might really have the contacts and can connect you with someone, but they wouldn't be dealing with unknown songwriters online. Their client list should be long enough with established writers to be honest.

Why do they go that route? Because it's in demand. You can't believe how many potential clients knock on our door (virtually, we are online, but you get the message) asking if they choose us to produce their song, will we pitch it for them. The answer is always the same: No, we won't. We make it clear that they pay for the production, receive a professional produced song and then they're on their own. We won't get involved in pitching, promoting etc. their songs. You know what happens in most cases? They turn around and go to the next company which promise them to make them a star only to be disappointed in the end. I'm fine with that, because the ones that do stick with us will get exactly what we promise. I wouldn't know how to explain why Rihanna ended up not listening to the song we produced lol.

As Colin said, only the top few of any highly competitive business actually make a decent living with what they do. If that's your goal, you do need well produced songs, I think nobody will deny this. Will someone just give you a major placement? Probably not, you will have to do the leg work yourself.

To answer your question about if it's legit to change the melody to an existing tune? Well, it's been done many times and I don't see anything wrong with it. Often times, the lyrics are great but the melody not very catchy, so it makes sense to change. What I don't get is, you said: "X was highly enthusiastic about the two songs in particular." So, why did he want to change it? Why not simply produce it with the same melody but a different production. I mean, if everyone is happy with the composition and melody, but the song is a Country tune, but he wants to produce a pop tune, well than produce a pop tune, but without changing the melody, take a fee for the production and leave the copyright to whoever wrote the lyrics and composed the music. Once you place the song with an artists, the list of "collaborators" will grow at that stage anyway most likely by the name of the singer and producer of the final version to be released ;-)


https://tunedly.com - Connecting you to the world's best session musicians online.

Contact me at chris@tunedly.com
#1095048 - 11/04/15 02:02 PM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: Chris Erhardt]  
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,622
DonnaMarilyn Offline
Top 100 Poster
DonnaMarilyn  Offline
Top 100 Poster

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,622
Netherlands
Kevin, Colin (again), Barry, and Christian, thank you for your thoughts. Absolutely agree.

Songcat, you hit the nail on the head. If something's so good, why change it?

I reckon X was taking steps to boost potential income by claiming co-authorship on both lyrics and music/melody if the song ended up being published. And all on my dime. tongue

Pretty crafty thinking. grin

As to my original query, I guess the answer is yes, it's all too common. frown Whether it's unethical is subjective, of course. One can only follow one's instincts in this regard.

I'm all in favour of bringing in another composer if the original music really isn't up to the mark. There's nothing wrong with this per se. But in my case, my collaborator and the vocalist had done a fine job (also according to the pro who'd critiqued and given it the go-ahead). But to be honest, I had so many misgivings already about X's modus operandi (there were other factors), that even if I hadn't felt strongly about the high quality of the music & melody (and of course the outlandish fee), I wouldn't have gone ahead anyway with the project.

I initially got in touch with X by way of a website (deep in the excessive wordage was the promise of 'magic' and sure-fire 'success'. laugh ) The production cost was mentioned nowhere on the site, however. It was simply referred to obliquely as a 'creative fee'. I only learned of the actual amount during a phone call. And it was only after I'd declined that X made a quick last-ditch effort to win me over by informing me that the production costs included extras, such as attorney's fees, meetings, travelling here and there, etc. I can't imagine why X thought that info might make the fee more palatable. grin

In any case, it's all water under the bridge. And a useful lesson learned. wink

Donna


Honour the Earth. Without it, we'd be nowhere.

Life is too important to take seriously.

http://www.reverbnation.com/donnamarilynrichblend

Guild of International Songwriters and Composers


#1095057 - 11/04/15 03:26 PM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: DonnaMarilyn]  
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,039
Ray E. Strode Online content
Top 30 Poster
Ray E. Strode  Online Content
Top 30 Poster

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,039
Brunswick, Ga. USA
Don't know how much of this is still going on in Nashville but the legitimate players know where all the bad apples are.

As a former member here used to say, I don't pay them, they pay me.

Usually, if it sounds too good to be true, most likely, it is.

Nothing wrong in investing in yourself, as long as you are well informed of what and who are investing with.


Ray E. Strode
#1095058 - 11/04/15 03:58 PM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: Ray E. Strode]  
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,622
DonnaMarilyn Offline
Top 100 Poster
DonnaMarilyn  Offline
Top 100 Poster

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,622
Netherlands
That's it for sure, Ray.

Luckily, my own instincts were flashing red, plus I got in touch with a couple of reliable sources, who were able to fill me in on a few things relating to X. So I definitely came well informed to the 'decline' decision. wink

Donna

Originally Posted by Ray E. Strode


Usually, if it sounds too good to be true, most likely, it is.

Nothing wrong in investing in yourself, as long as you are well informed of what and who are investing with.


Honour the Earth. Without it, we'd be nowhere.

Life is too important to take seriously.

http://www.reverbnation.com/donnamarilynrichblend

Guild of International Songwriters and Composers


#1095099 - 11/05/15 08:12 AM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: DonnaMarilyn]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 413
Bernd Harmsen Offline
Top 500 Poster
Bernd Harmsen  Offline
Top 500 Poster

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 413
> Is what I've described a normal and ethical procedure in the industry? <
No.

Besides, there is a formal flaw in X's reasoning. I assume that you wrote the words, your partner did the music. In this case your partner must agree to have the melody altered. He then is still entitled to a share as co-composer of the song (actually Mr. X would function as an arranger - but, depending on the contract that is agreed on, he might also become a co-composer). Nothing to do with your share as a lyricist.

Fees and royalties for producers and musicians are a different piece of cake altogether. Also, it's not the creators who are supposed to pay any fees but the musicians or their label.

Have fun,
Bernd


Bernd
[url]http://bernd-harmsen.com[/url]
#1095112 - 11/05/15 03:31 PM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: Bernd Harmsen]  
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 236
Chris Erhardt Offline
Serious Contributor
Chris Erhardt  Offline
Serious Contributor

Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 236
NYC/L.A.
Originally Posted by Bernd Harmsen
Also, it's not the creators who are supposed to pay any fees but the musicians or their label.
Bernd


That is partly true if you talk about the final release to be published publicly. But, at the demo stage, it's usually the writers who pay for the production cost to produce something "pitchable" in the first place unless you're lucky enough to be signed to a publisher who covers the cost or parts of it.


https://tunedly.com - Connecting you to the world's best session musicians online.

Contact me at chris@tunedly.com
#1095134 - 11/06/15 02:39 AM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: Chris Erhardt]  
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,707
MidniteBob Offline
Top 100 Poster
MidniteBob  Offline
Top 100 Poster

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,707
Raleigh, ya'll
Originally Posted by songcat
Originally Posted by Bernd Harmsen
Also, it's not the creators who are supposed to pay any fees but the musicians or their label.
Bernd


That is partly true if you talk about the final release to be published publicly. But, at the demo stage, it's usually the writers who pay for the production cost to produce something "pitchable" in the first place unless you're lucky enough to be signed to a publisher who covers the cost or parts of it.


That's a good "partly true" Songcat. A laborer is worth their hire! But in this case, Donna already had a demo, and a good one.

As she says, "It's water under the bridge"...Which, since she lives in Holland, is not a phrase to be taken lightly:-)

But bottom line in this instance..."X" is a predator on dreams...I think Dante covered their eventual destination in the 4th Circle...

Midnite


Satchel was right. Something is gaining on me.

The Shoebox & Dinner at Eight trailers available at:

http://www.twometer.com/Two_Meter_Studios/HOME.html
#1095139 - 11/06/15 05:08 AM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: MidniteBob]  
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 236
Chris Erhardt Offline
Serious Contributor
Chris Erhardt  Offline
Serious Contributor

Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 236
NYC/L.A.
Yeah, most likely he was. Even if she didn't have a good demo already, he still would have been a predator on dreams if he promised fame and fortune without being able to deliver.

I think it's important to be upfront and say what will be delivered for how much $.

$$$ will get you a demo of this quality, here are some examples, here are some previous clients... Period. Sounds like fair deal.

$$$$$ will get you a demo of this quality and I might make you rich and famous because 20 years ago I was the assistant engineer of a billboard top 100 song... That may be not so much of a fair deal.

I think we all agree about Mr. X and the fact that most likely it was the right decision to walk away from that 'deal'.

However, I do want to point out that even though Donna had a good demo, there are still cases where it makes sense to do another one.

For example: She has a strong Country demo of a really good song she wrote. However, there is an opportunity for a Pop placement and after consideration, she feels the song would make a great Pop tune as well.

The above case happens more often than you think actually. Songwriters often turn to me to change the genre of a particular song they already recorded elsewhere.

However, that still doesn't give Mr. X any legit reason to change the melody, especially if he said that he liked the original composition.


https://tunedly.com - Connecting you to the world's best session musicians online.

Contact me at chris@tunedly.com
#1095205 - 11/07/15 12:53 AM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: Chris Erhardt]  
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,707
MidniteBob Offline
Top 100 Poster
MidniteBob  Offline
Top 100 Poster

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,707
Raleigh, ya'll
Exactly!

You, and other talented folks here..(insert a shout-out to Mike Z) charge for services rendered, at a fair price. Everyone involved knows what they want, and what they'll get, with no worries about being scammed...:-)


Midnite


Satchel was right. Something is gaining on me.

The Shoebox & Dinner at Eight trailers available at:

http://www.twometer.com/Two_Meter_Studios/HOME.html
#1095210 - 11/07/15 07:39 AM Re: Standard practice? Ethical or not? [Re: MidniteBob]  
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,622
DonnaMarilyn Offline
Top 100 Poster
DonnaMarilyn  Offline
Top 100 Poster

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,622
Netherlands
Bernd, Songcat, and Midnite, thank you for the further comments and insights.

Christian, I agree about adapting a song to suit another genre. I've done this two or three times with another collaborator, where we used the same lyric in a couple of different genres.

This wasn't the case, though, with the song in question. The song was already country, and the new music/melody would have been country as well.

By the way, Midnite, I had to smile at your 'Dante' comment. We must be on the same wave-length, because the night before last, Dante's 'Inferno' sprang suddenly to mind (and in a manner entirely unrelated to the current topic), and I jotted down a note to myself to write a lyric referring to one of the circles of hell. grin

Anyway, in an ideal world it should all boil down to transparency: 'what you see is what you get'. smile

Donna


Honour the Earth. Without it, we'd be nowhere.

Life is too important to take seriously.

http://www.reverbnation.com/donnamarilynrichblend

Guild of International Songwriters and Composers



Support Just Plain Folks

We would like to keep the membership in Just Plain Folks FREE! Your donation helps support the many programs we offer including Road Trips and the Music Awards.


Membership
Join Just Plain Folks
to receive the free
JPNotes Newsletter!
*this is separate from
message board registration*

Newest Members
Mrs_Sue_Saunders, Spanky9, Hicham, olivergonegreen, RobertBolster
21094 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums116
Topics118,309
Posts1,115,290
Members21,094
Average Posts Daily25
Most Online1,506
Mar 16th, 2017
Just Plain Quotes
"Defeatist Pessimists and Rose Colored Glasses Optimists are lonely companions, victims even. Both ideologies imply predestined outcomes, and therefore breed inactivity in its victims. Inaction is the only sure way to lose at anything in life. All positive action guarantees at least a fighting chance." -Brian Austin Whitney
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Popular Topics(Views)
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0