Originally Posted by Brian Austin Whitney
This sounds to me like a loss to songwriter rights rather than a win or am I missing something?

This means fractional licensing continues. Which means that digital services like Google has to continue getting all rights for songs from all writers/publishers involved. The idea of the "new" consent decree was for them to be able to go to a single writer for the rights of the song - meaning they could find out who was cheapest, then license it 100% from the cheapest source.

Thus it would depend on your view of if its better to have fractional licensing or force 100% licensing upon everyone involved in a song by one person.

I've had co-writers ask me to sign various worthless "exposure" type of deals. However, if this had gone thru, I might have been forced into any one of those bad deals even though I'm not BMI or ASCAP.

Though I wonder how all that would play out if the DOJ did get the 100% licensing done, if a song involved a SESAC writer (as SESAC is not under the Consent Decree).


Jody Whitesides
A Funky Audio Lap Dance For Your Ears!
www.jodywhitesides.com